TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ubuntu 25.10 Replaces GNU Coreutils with Rust Uutils

30 点作者 donnachangstein22 天前

6 条评论

JonathonW22 天前
This reads like AI spew, and it&#x27;s also not news (the post announcing this initiative [1] is from March).<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discourse.ubuntu.com&#x2F;t&#x2F;carefully-but-purposefully-oxidising-ubuntu&#x2F;56995" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discourse.ubuntu.com&#x2F;t&#x2F;carefully-but-purposefully-ox...</a>
lionkor22 天前
That&#x27;s the worst idea I&#x27;ve seen in a while. People rely on the behaviors of the GNU coreutils, this is going to break a lot of stuff. The uutils are not there yet at all.
评论 #43780213 未加载
评论 #43779819 未加载
评论 #43779864 未加载
polycaster22 天前
&gt; The replacement will affect more than a hundred utilities that are part of Coreutils<p>…<p>&gt; Last week, the issue of the package uutils coreutils 0.0.30 successfully passed 507 tests (in the last issue of 506, in a year old – 476) from the standard GNU Coreutils test set.<p>If I’m reading this right then there are on average only one to five tests per utility (like cat, dd, …) which is a shockingly low number. Particularly when you consider how many options a single command alone might accept. And of course, this alone would not even remotely cover a critical part of all the circumstances that might vary.
评论 #43779870 未加载
tuananh22 天前
Does GNU coreutils have that many CVE?
评论 #43779876 未加载
temp082622 天前
Does this fix something specific with coreutils (is there no way to upstream patches?)? Or is it that rust is supposed to save us from some class of unknowns (related to memory safety?)?
评论 #43779834 未加载
WhereIsTheTruth22 天前
I&#x27;m glad I no longer depend on Ubuntu<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43313214">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43313214</a>