TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Berkeley Humanoid Lite – Open-source robot

282 点作者 ratsbane22 天前

12 条评论

MoonGhost21 天前
What is the way to go in hobby robotics today? I'm more interested in high level, and want the lower level to 'just work' with minimum efforts from my side. Having mechanical part and vision what would be the right choice for low-middle software to control robotic arm and car, may be attached one to another. ROS2?
评论 #43806613 未加载
评论 #43806019 未加载
评论 #43806336 未加载
bjackman21 天前
I think this is a great idea. It seems like we are entering the phase where the core hardware problems are solved and we now need to:<p>A) bring down cost and expand the design space for the hardware and<p>B) minimise the barriers to working on the &quot;software&quot; problems where there still seem to be huge areas of mostly unaddressed challenges.<p>An open source platform seems like a good thing for both.
lifeisstillgood21 天前
I have long assumed that we won’t be getting robot butlers partly because it’s really really hard, but also because most of not all things we want robots for it’s easier to reconfigure the environment than make a flexible humaniod<p>So factories are obvious but the real mass uptake is the home - and honestly I think something that cleans and tidies an hour a day might actually be achievable
评论 #43804759 未加载
RetroTechie21 天前
As much as I like the concept, 3D printing everything is <i>not</i> the way to lower cost.<p>Mass-produced (stamped &#x2F; extruded &#x2F; whatever) mechanical parts + hackable &#x27;brains&#x27; is.<p>Robots <i>do</i> lend themselves well w&#x2F; respect to that last part. Worst case is rip out its control electronics wholesale &amp; replace with your own motor drivers etc.
评论 #43802603 未加载
评论 #43803453 未加载
评论 #43819717 未加载
评论 #43805473 未加载
评论 #43805171 未加载
frainfreeze22 天前
the cost-effectiveness&#x2F;performance factor benchmark is interesting, but it feels slightly misleading - I just don&#x27;t see how &quot;average peak torque of all actuated DoFs, normalized by the robot&#x27;s size&quot; is related to measuring &quot;accessibility and customizability&quot; of the robot.
评论 #43800670 未加载
larodi21 天前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lite.berkeley-humanoid.org&#x2F;static&#x2F;comparision.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lite.berkeley-humanoid.org&#x2F;static&#x2F;comparision.png</a><p>why does it say the Berkeley Humanoid is closed source here? Is it a typo, was this paper peer-reviewed?
评论 #43804206 未加载
DonHopkins21 天前
Robot gets Piercing in Berkeley:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;0Gkl1H2eKsM?t=99" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;0Gkl1H2eKsM?t=99</a><p>Servitude: Robot Waiter:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=NXsUetUzXlg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=NXsUetUzXlg</a><p>Empathy: Broken Robot:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=KXrbqXPnHvE" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=KXrbqXPnHvE</a>
em0sh22 天前
The performance factor vs. torque vs. DOFs is the most silly thing as a licensed mechanical engineer I have ever seen. And I was around for Kony 2012.
评论 #43801375 未加载
dheera21 天前
I was hoping &quot;Lite&quot; would be a smaller humanoid that I could build for &lt;$5K, but this looks expensive.
评论 #43834797 未加载
demaga22 天前
Very cool! Open source robotics is something I always imagined to be a part of the future. Hope the idea catches on.
bk49621 天前
A left handed robot!
gitroom21 天前
been cool watching robots go open source like this, always gets me thinking how much i could hack together something dumb just to see if it works