TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

We Now Know How AI 'Thinks'–and It's Barely Thinking at All

34 点作者 uxhacker18 天前

4 条评论

uxhacker18 天前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;whcKL" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;whcKL</a>
chii18 天前
An AI doesn&#x27;t need to think in the same way humans think. It just needs to achieve results (that are better, or at least equal to humans).<p>The same question has been asked of chess &quot;ai&quot; in the past - that chess ai isn&#x27;t thinking, it&#x27;s &quot;just&quot; searching through all possibilities etc. And yet, the result is that no humans can beat chess ais now-a-days.
评论 #43802124 未加载
评论 #43804081 未加载
评论 #43810786 未加载
felixhammerl18 天前
In the news we seem to have reached Schrödinger&#x27;s AI: Too dumb to do anything properly, but coming for everyone&#x27;s jobs due to being too powerful.
评论 #43806793 未加载
评论 #43810792 未加载
rkagerer18 天前
I&#x27;m growing weary of all the AI hype being shoved down my throat. Every time I dig into examples of what it can do, the result seems shittier than what a talented human would achieve instead. I&#x27;m forming an impression it&#x27;s a kludge for the mediocre.<p>I don&#x27;t <i>want</i> to be a crotchety old grump about this - I&#x27;d love to hear thoughts on truly notable examples where quality far exceeds our existing best in class work.
评论 #43802094 未加载
评论 #43803450 未加载
评论 #43801982 未加载
评论 #43802482 未加载
评论 #43802284 未加载
评论 #43802308 未加载