TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Why does OpenAI require an ID to use their image API?

6 点作者 speedylight27 天前
I was hoping to try out the “Open”AI image generation API in their Playground but it asked me to give them a copy of my ID for verification?<p>I was planning to build a couple of web applications on top of the API but this is really off putting, especially given how prevalent data breaches have become and the simple fact that there’s no need for it other than their pathetic attempts to look like they care about AI safety.

3 条评论

wkat424227 天前
It&#x27;s weird because I can do this and I&#x27;m sure I never sent them any verification. Because I&#x27;m always incredibly hesitant to do so, it would have been a dealbreaker. Our national IDs contain a lot of sensitive info. The government even advises us to black those out. But then most companies refuse it.<p>I do have credits paid up though and I&#x27;ve had an account since the early days of DALL-E. Maybe having a payment method serves as verification? Or it only applies to recently created accounts?
jmcguckin26 天前
I think part of the reason is that they want to be able to track the images back to you. Some person in the company is probably worried that a user will generate child porn like images and distribute them on the net. When the cops eventually come calling, they want to point to the user. This probably means there is a user-id embedded somewhere in the image.
评论 #43820930 未加载
muzani24 天前
OpenAI has always been somewhat controlling of their output. They used to require that anything that uses their API go through a verification process to prevent it from being used for fake reviews, astroturfing, etc. This was the main criticism of OpenAI 3 or so years ago. But with all the other alternatives, it hasn&#x27;t stopped people.<p>I suppose while they have the best image generator of the quarter, they&#x27;ll be more restrictive with it.