There is nothing "alleged" about wikipedia's activites that have absolutely nothing to do with publishing an open source online encyclopedia, and have gone from an "inclusivity" statement into spending money on "programs" in an entirely discretionary manner that has absolutly no possible conection or meaning to an ALL inclusive publishing endevour.
knowledge IS power
but picking WHO gets to be empowered, and heard is called censorship and discrimination, no matter how disadvantaged and under represented those chosen are.
publishing is one thing, how people are empowered by that information is another.
wiki crossed the line,failed to pick a lane, and will very likely end up causing more suffering, than if they had left the pie, alone
and just done there stated job, very, very, well