TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Is outbound going to die?

129 点作者 whoami_nr17 天前

23 条评论

neom17 天前
I&#x27;ve been doing GTM for I dunno... 20+ years now, I&#x27;m told I&#x27;m excellent at it. Never liked outbound, I&#x27;ve never found it&#x27;s a good part of a GTM, and tbh it&#x27;s always something I&#x27;ve considered mostly belongs with the folks who think &quot;growth hacking&quot; is a thing...I strongly believe in the pillars of traditional, early 1900s GTM... that is, build real trust, have a credible brand story, get word of mouth going by consistently exceeding expectations, and let your delighted customers become your most effective marketing channel. If you&#x27;re going to do outbound, go to events or find places real customers might be hanging out and not annoyed by you talking to them. Inbound marketing and community-driven growth strategies have always seemed significantly more durable to me. When people genuinely need and seek out your product, when the recommendation comes from trusted peers rather than relentless cold emails or hyper personalized spam, your sales become robust, resilient, and scalable in a sustainable way, the problems with sales is they&#x27;re always chasing the next lead. Maybe outbound might yield short term wins...but personally I&#x27;ve always thought... if you want lasting competitive advantage, invest your energy in creating a brand people truly want to share, that&#x27;s how I&#x27;ve always thought about it anyway, and people have always seemed to enjoy my brands.<p>Outbound will never die, but fingers crossed lazy-ass sales and marketing does!
评论 #43824816 未加载
评论 #43826190 未加载
评论 #43826952 未加载
评论 #43826087 未加载
huhkerrf17 天前
I&#x27;ve got the misfortune of being connected to former sales colleagues on LinkedIn, so I see the kind of posts they are liking.<p>And I can&#x27;t tell you how many of them are complaining when people complain about cold calling and mass sales emails. I&#x27;ve got a fairly even take on sales, but the absolute entitlement they feel about your time...<p>Outbound can&#x27;t die soon enough.
评论 #43825062 未加载
评论 #43828070 未加载
评论 #43826900 未加载
joenot44317 天前
Sometimes I wonder if we as internet people are special in that it seems we can pretty immediately spot vanilla-LLM generated text. I&#x27;m sure others have noticed the same, but maybe 20% of my inbound recruiter pings on LinkedIn are straight from GPT and subsequently are immediately dismissed.<p>I posted a job on UpWork last month and probably 60% of the replies were LLM, some of them seemingly automated as they came in moments after I posted. Obviously these were immediately rejected.<p>Is this something we&#x27;ll have to get used to?<p>I got my first internship in 2015 by cold-emailing the CEO of a Waterloo startup that I thought was really cool. At the time, reaching out directly over email with a thoughtful and earnest introduction was a good way to set yourself apart. I&#x27;m not sure that&#x27;s the case anymore.
评论 #43825273 未加载
评论 #43824904 未加载
评论 #43824696 未加载
danielodievich16 天前
By virtue of what I do, I interact with quite a few of our SDRs who do outbound calls all day long AND I am frequently on the receiving end of someone else&#x27;s calls. It is a hard job. Attention is a very scarce commodity and the shotgunning of the LLM swill that has completely taken over the outbound has made it even scarcer.<p>A fun thing happened recently. At sales kick off I was having lunch in the mountain skiing and a few young SDRs joined me with their burritos. We were chatting and I got an inbound call from some random numberI picked up and sure enough it was an SDR from some random SaaS that&#x27;s been trying and failing to reach me. I told that SDR, hey, you got me and 3 of your fellow SDRs here, take your best shot, you will be rated by people who do your job. Ha, he did pretty good! Our SDRs gave him a bunch of sh*t about not using the right call dialer management. It was a &quot;closed lost&quot; opportunity for them.
评论 #43825346 未加载
cpncrunch17 天前
Whether it&#x27;s crafted by AI or not, outbound is spam, and only scammy companies use it these days.
评论 #43824483 未加载
评论 #43824711 未加载
评论 #43834143 未加载
评论 #43825162 未加载
tiffanyh16 天前
While the post has good points - you can&#x27;t talk about this subject without defining what price points you&#x27;re selling at.<p>A company will have radically different sales motions if they are selling a good&#x2F;service costing:<p><pre><code> * &lt; $5k * $5-50k * $50-500k * $500k + </code></pre> Seems to me this post is probably targeting the top 1 (or 2) bullets&#x2F;segments.
评论 #43827547 未加载
评论 #43827838 未加载
rorylaitila17 天前
I&#x27;ve always been a relationship seller. I agree that a lot of the AI hype surrounding outbound is going to be short lived. When everyone can do infinite outbound, no one will be able to break through. The AI arms race to get a slight edge on response rates is going to destroy that channel.<p>I&#x27;ve been working on <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;humancrm.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;humancrm.io</a> to scratch my own itch. A CRM that helps me stay focused on relationships. I&#x27;m explicitly not adding any AI or automation to it.
评论 #43824674 未加载
评论 #43827786 未加载
评论 #43824557 未加载
dccoolgai17 天前
I would put a finer&#x2F;pithier point on it:<p>The &quot;attention economy&quot; is out, the &quot;trust economy&quot; is in.
评论 #43824923 未加载
mathgeek16 天前
&gt; Eventually, humans are going to get used to the constant spam and start mentally tuning out these hyper personalized initiatives.<p>Maybe I just live in a bubble, but don’t most people already tune out ads and marketing emails while online?
评论 #43825986 未加载
评论 #43825963 未加载
评论 #43826935 未加载
carefulfungi16 天前
AI good enough to pitch me but not good enough to read my email and alert me of products I should actually care about seems like the dystopian outcome ad-tech typically reaches.
评论 #43825975 未加载
zcmack16 天前
<i>Eventually, humans are going to get used to the constant spam and start mentally tuning out these hyper personalized initiatives.</i><p>haven&#x27;t we already been doing this since email templating was a thing?
评论 #43828219 未加载
deadbabe16 天前
This is why the “Lean Startup” movement popular in early 2010s ultimately died: The market eventually got tired of every new startup being some vaporware product market fit test where a product wasn’t even fully built out because the founders wanted to push risk onto customers instead of going all in.<p>So now you have to do all the big things upfront and come to market with a fully polished professional offering to be taken seriously.
评论 #43826912 未加载
MobiusHorizons16 天前
Nice article, I hope we see the volume of spam and marketing reduce overall, but I wouldn’t bet on it even if it does become ineffective.<p>Just fyi, there are a few typos I noticed:<p>&gt; where the accuracy and quality of the has improved tremendously at scale.<p>Missing a word. Maybe “content “?<p>&gt; this is also going to cause a certain about of fatigue for the users and customers.<p>about -&gt; amount
dismalpedigree16 天前
Can we skip to the part where unsolicited emails, calls, and texts go away? This sounds amazing.
jongjong16 天前
From my perspective, as someone who is not good at marketing and sales, this is going to be positive because the playing field will have to focus more on product. Currently, I&#x27;m being out-competed by people who can sell well. A landing page with nothing behind it is out-competing my fully working product.<p>If outbound sales becomes ineffective, people will have more opportunities and time to think about their inherent needs, as opposed to being funneled into all their decisions by a salesperson.<p>It&#x27;s frightening how much stuff people are buying that they don&#x27;t need. While there exist stuff which they need that they don&#x27;t know exists.
libertine16 天前
I don&#x27;t think messaging has improved - maybe on avg. but it&#x27;s still clearly AI-generated.<p>The number of companies that &quot;Elevate&quot; services&#x2F;quality&#x2F;experiences... It&#x27;s getting so sloppy.<p>But a lot of these points are recurring ones over the years, it&#x27;s just like a rubber band that stretches.<p>At some point, CEOs will go on LinkedIn ...<p>&quot;We loved the AI boom and it helped us improve a lot of our processes! But we need human connection, and that&#x27;s irreplaceable - but now our differentiator is that we have humans reaching out to humans. AI will still be here as a sidekick.&quot;
rglullis17 天前
&gt; Having a good Twitter&#x2F;social media presence will become a compulsory pre-condition. The company owned channels (like websites, email lists or apps) where you have direct access to customers will become key demand generation pipelines.<p>The ability to control their own media presence is what still makes me believe that ActivityPub has a future, but it depends on companies and marketers realizing that they need to be proactive about it; instead of just sitting on their hands and chasing the audiences wherever they <i>think</i> they are going.
评论 #43826837 未加载
alister16 天前
In the face of this AI-powered sales onslaught, <i>customers</i> will use AI-powered tools to analyze and evaluate all corporate products and services to make their purchasing decisions, without talking to anyone. Personal connections won’t be the solution to sales when customers trust their personal AI agents even more than real-life contacts.
评论 #43826764 未加载
p0w3n3d16 天前
Fun fact: in my language (Polish) those AI generated voices are unbearable. I understand that this can improve making them indistinguishable from real person, but so far it all sounds to us like a fake person from temu.
snowwrestler16 天前
&gt; While I think these AI powered sales products are going to perform very well in the short run, this is also going to cause a certain about of fatigue for the users and customers.<p>I mean, speaking for myself, the fatigue is real and it’s been here for years.<p>I don’t think LLM content is going to make cold emails seem any warmer. I’ve never opened one and thought “if only this high-volume automated text were slightly more personalized.”<p>That said, I keep getting them. Seems like nothing can kill outbound, and I doubt LLMs will either.
irq-116 天前
&gt; With LLMs, the messages and content have gotten to a point where the accuracy and quality of the __?????__ has improved tremendously at scale.
Animats16 天前
Doesn&#x27;t everybody on here have filters good enough to route all &quot;outbound&quot; to spam?
cogitovirus16 天前
everyone blasting ai-generated posts, bots, and videos is slowly making real people invisible.