TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Can the 4th Amendment protect against IRS Audits?

1 点作者 vitarnixofntrnt15 天前
Unless they have probable cause of a crime or a warrant, could it be argued that the 4th amendment protect against IRS Audits in Court?<p>My goal is to go down in the history books for getting the government to bug patch the constitution.

3 条评论

k31015 天前
The constitution needs a more urgent patch.<p>Gödel&#x27;s Loophole [0]<p>&gt; Gödel&#x27;s Loophole is a supposed &quot;inner contradiction&quot; in the Constitution of the United States which Austrian-American logician, mathematician, and analytic philosopher Kurt Gödel postulated in 1947. The loophole would permit the American democracy to be legally turned into a dictatorship. Gödel told his friend Oskar Morgenstern about the existence of the flaw and Morgenstern told Albert Einstein about it at the time, but Morgenstern, in his recollection of the incident in 1971, never mentioned the exact problem as Gödel saw it. This has led to speculation about the precise nature of what has come to be called &quot;Gödel&#x27;s Loophole.&quot; It has been called &quot;one of the great unsolved problems of constitutional law&quot; by American constitutional law scholar John Nowak<p>&gt; Since the exact nature of Gödel&#x27;s Loophole has never been published, what it is, precisely, is not known. In his 2012 paper &quot;Gödel&#x27;s Loophole&quot; F. E. Guerra-Pujol speculates that the problem involves Article V, which describes the process by which the Constitution can be amended. The loophole is that Article V&#x27;s procedures can be applied to Article V itself. It can therefore be altered in a &quot;downward&quot; direction, making it easier to alter the article again in the future. So even if, as is now the case, amending the Constitution is difficult to bring about, once Article V is downwardly amended, the next attempt to do so will be easier, and the one after that easier still.[1][2]<p>&gt; Other writers have speculated that Gödel may have had other aspects of the Constitution in mind as well, including the abuse of gerrymandering, prorogation of Congress, the Electoral College, and the presidential pardon.<p>My, my, those &quot;other aspects&quot; couldn&#x27;t possibly be abused. (extreme sarcasm)<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;G%C3%B6del%27s_Loophole" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;G%C3%B6del%27s_Loophole</a>
评论 #43832958 未加载
JohnFen15 天前
FWIW, here is what the IRS has to say about this argument:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.irs.gov&#x2F;privacy-disclosure&#x2F;the-truth-about-frivolous-tax-arguments-section-i-d-to-e#contentiond2" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.irs.gov&#x2F;privacy-disclosure&#x2F;the-truth-about-frivo...</a>
byoung215 天前
Wouldn&#x27;t an audit be an examination of materials you are asked to provide? They will not enter your residence or business and seize these items themselves.
评论 #43831759 未加载
评论 #43831789 未加载