TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

New atomic fountain clock joins group that keeps the world on time

118 点作者 austinallegro16 天前

9 条评论

infogulch15 天前
Cesium-based atomic clocks (&quot;fountain clocks&quot;) like these use the natural resonance frequency of electron orbital energy states under a microwave laser which can be counted to measure time. Since there is a natural background noise of microwaves and many frequencies can interact with orbitals it&#x27;s important to isolate the atoms from outside sources of electromagnetic radiation and heat in order to maintain accuracy.<p>Earlier this year there was a big leap in so-called &quot;nuclear clocks&quot; which uses the resonant frequency of energy states <i>of a nucleus itself</i> as opposed to electron orbitals around it. Besides the &quot;more frequency = more better&quot; factor that has always driven clock accuracy -- thorium-229 nuclei excites in ultraviolet wavelengths -- nuclear clocks are better isolated than electron orbital-based clocks because the frequency band where they interact is impossibly narrow. In fact, the reason why it was only recently demonstrated is due to the difficulty of producing the required frequency at a high enough precision to interact reliably. This could lead to more accurate and more compact and cheaper clocks.<p>Discussion 4 months ago: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42362215">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42362215</a> | Major Leap for Nuclear Clock Paves Way for Ultraprecise Timekeeping (nist.gov)
RetroTechie15 天前
Some years back there was talk of an atomic clock that came in a very small package (matchbox &#x2F; cigarette pack size?). Iirc, saw a price indication of $1500 somewhere.<p>Something like that still around, and&#x2F;or available? Any updated designs?<p>Personally I have no need for ultra-accurate timekeeping. But hey... an atomic clock is way cooler than a Nixie clock or oven-controlled Xtal oscillator. And no... huge 2nd hand atomic clock found on eBay etc doesn&#x27;t cut it. Too big &#x2F;heavy &#x2F; power-hungry.
评论 #43846660 未加载
评论 #43849535 未加载
评论 #43846687 未加载
algorithmsRcool15 天前
I recall reading that our ability to measure time accurately exceeds that of any other quantity. According to the NIST, the newest Optical Lattice clocks would drift by less than 1 second if they were started 13 billion years ago at the big bang. What else can we measure down past 1 part per 10e18?
评论 #43845181 未加载
评论 #43847855 未加载
评论 #43849187 未加载
WarOnPrivacy15 天前
NIST explainer: Cesium Fountain Clock [1999]<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nist.gov&#x2F;news-events&#x2F;news&#x2F;1999&#x2F;12&#x2F;nist-f1-cesium-fountain-clock" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nist.gov&#x2F;news-events&#x2F;news&#x2F;1999&#x2F;12&#x2F;nist-f1-cesium...</a>
0cf8612b2e1e15 天前
How do you sync atomic clocks? When the error rate is 1&#x2F;1e16, your error in propagating the time from one clock to another is going to be off by many orders of magnitude vs the timekeeper itself.
评论 #43850067 未加载
评论 #43849655 未加载
CGMthrowaway15 天前
Can&#x27;t mention a fountain clock without calling to mind one the Lion Clock in Alhambra Palace, of my favorite things ever:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.iflscience.com&#x2F;this-incredible-islamic-fountain-from-the-1300s-might-have-actually-been-a-clock-77044" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.iflscience.com&#x2F;this-incredible-islamic-fountain-...</a>
throw0101a15 天前
What are &#x27;limits&#x27; on how accurate enough clocks &#x27;should&#x27; be?<p>Presumably there&#x27;s diminishing returns, but as the article says we&#x27;re at one part in 2.2e-16, are there practical application of going further?
评论 #43857143 未加载
评论 #43844731 未加载
评论 #43853814 未加载
move-on-by15 天前
How many atomic clocks are in operation in Colorado now? It would be nice if they could be spread around a bit. I suppose there are logistical issues that keep them centralized?
评论 #43846553 未加载
评论 #43847249 未加载
评论 #43844942 未加载
geerlingguy14 天前
New goal: upgrading from a Rubidium CSAC to NIST-F4.<p>I&#x27;ve also been reading about nuclear clocks[1]... skipping over the uncertainty of the entire atom&#x27;s chaotic oscillations entirely!<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nuclear_clock" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nuclear_clock</a>
评论 #43851436 未加载