TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Elixir is not owned by Big Tech

37 点作者 lawik23 天前

3 条评论

rc0022 天前
&gt; I think Zig is mostly community-driven and seems to have some traction. Not Rust levels of traction but definitely relevance.<p>Zig already appears to have lapped Rust in areas like game development, GUIs, compilation speeds, C FFI, etc. and all that despite Zig not yet being 1.0. That means backwards compatibility is not guaranteed until then nor is the full feature set fully defined. Notwithstanding that 1.0 release, traction and relevance only seem to be a matter of time.
arcanemachiner23 天前
On the one hand, all the major languages enjoy the backing of corporate behemoths to some degree or another.<p>On the other hand, I don&#x27;t have to worry that Google is just going to fire José and mothball Elixir on some random day.
评论 #43892564 未加载
petejodo23 天前
Maybe Haxe is an example of another language like this. I wonder if it applies though to languages that are hosted i.e. Elixir is constrained somewhat by what Ericsson decides to do w&#x2F; Erlang