TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Multiboard 3D Printed Storage System

18 点作者 3dsnano12 天前

2 条评论

misnome12 天前
Found it interesting initially (although the demo pack didn’t even include pre-plated unless you paid) but the license was really, really a killer for me. It used to claim “CC but we modified it” and seems nowhere close now - current seems to be:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.google.com&#x2F;document&#x2F;d&#x2F;1C0-Iyxydqk_d2I3o_5ualJ9Ywt9gwVdl9eukvC8JeKA&#x2F;mobilebasic" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.google.com&#x2F;document&#x2F;d&#x2F;1C0-Iyxydqk_d2I3o_5ualJ9Y...</a><p>And there are a hell of a lot of red flags in here for me.<p>Things like, free, but you aren’t allowed to redistribute the STL. You can modify, but only allowed to distribute if “heavily” modified and the only person allowed to judge that is the original designer.<p>Entirely their right, but no thanks for me.
评论 #43864197 未加载
lbussell12 天前
For those looking for a more open alternative, check out openGrid - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=2mDBue4fw3U" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=2mDBue4fw3U</a><p>I found Multiboard really confusing and it was never clear what I actually needed to print to start snapping things together. openGrid is much simpler in comparison and also took up a lot less material (especially when using the Lite grid variant)