TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

EU to ban anonymous crypto accounts and privacy coins by 2027

93 点作者 alexey-salmin6 天前

13 条评论

neiman6 天前
I&#x27;m a foreigner living in the EU for many years, here&#x27;s my 2 cents.<p>For over a year, I was locked out of financial services due to my inability to pass KYC. The reason was that I had already left one country, but was still in the process of getting a residency visa in another. During the process, I&#x27;m allowed to live in this country, but I have no ability to prove it to any financial institutions.<p>So, no wonder I&#x27;m bitter about KYC and AML.<p>Regarding privacy, I appreciate the EU&#x27;s effort, but I also feel they focus too much on the legal side and not enough on the implementation side of it.<p>My ID was photocopied at almost every accommodation I visited in the last decade. I have no way to make private digital payments, and even offline cash is not being promoted.<p>At least once, my private financial record was accessed by a 3rd party that used it against me. But I&#x27;m not the kind of person who would go into a legal battle. I&#x27;m the kind of person who uses technology to protect his privacy. And the EU, with decisions like this, makes it very difficult for me.<p>I doubt banning Monero or Zcash would prevent criminals from tax evasion. They&#x27;ll find other ways. So, as often happens, &quot;Locks keep honest people honest&quot;.
评论 #43893790 未加载
评论 #43893658 未加载
评论 #43896850 未加载
cedws6 天前
Monero in particular absolutely terrifies governments and financial institutions - you can tell because it&#x27;s been banned and delisted practically everywhere. This gives me great confidence in it. Not as a speculative asset, but as a means of having truly private transactions.
评论 #43893527 未加载
lordofgibbons6 天前
These are the real Cypherpunk coins. Specially Monero. The premise behind Cryptocurrencies, (before crypto-bros joined), were all about distributed control, privacy, and censorship avoidance.<p>If there&#x27;s a single company or &quot;foundation&quot; that is in charge of development decisions, then it&#x27;s not a distributed currency. That&#x27;s no different from Paypal.<p>If a random country (that you don&#x27;t even live in) can block your wallet-address&#x2F;transactions then what you have is not a cryptocurrency worthy of its name (they can force miners and exchanges to not accept any funds that can easily be traced to your wallet address). Just use Venmo or Paypal at that point they have lower fees and faster transactions.
vizzah6 天前
And vitalik.eth was just essaying on how important privacy protocols are and how Ethereum must adopt them... Let EU ban ETH then and shift closer to the caveman era and be even more laughing stock for the (expectedly) more crypto-friendly US.
perlgeek6 天前
I wonder what the impact will be on ransomware attacks.<p>It&#x27;ll probably make it harder for people who aren&#x27;t in &quot;bullet-proof&quot; countries (i.e. without good cooperation with to receive ransom payment, which sounds like a good thing. It could also cause some decidedly negative effects during the transition, when companies that really want to pay a ransom (because they cannot recover otherwise) are unable to.
评论 #43893546 未加载
评论 #43893623 未加载
评论 #43895914 未加载
karel-3d6 天前
...on exchanges.<p>They don&#x27;t ban the coins and their private usages, they ban them on exchanges.
评论 #43893342 未加载
评论 #43893682 未加载
评论 #43893335 未加载
评论 #43893843 未加载
xyzal6 天前
I wonder what benefit to society might having a shadow financial system bring? I can&#x27;t think of any, except for financing entities operating outside lawful limits.
评论 #43894579 未加载
评论 #43894434 未加载
评论 #43893817 未加载
评论 #43894842 未加载
评论 #43899469 未加载
评论 #43897227 未加载
bilekas6 天前
&gt; Under the new Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (AMLR), credit institutions, financial institutions and crypto asset service providers (CASPs) will be prohibited from maintaining anonymous accounts or handling privacy-preserving cryptocurrencies, such as Monero<p>This isn&#x27;t really an issue, AML exists for a reason, having had experience in countries where corruption was extremely bad, AML combined with solid privacy obligations of data from the exchanger is a net positive thing.<p>People can complain about &quot;I want fully private transactions&quot; - Okay then use cash.<p>Otherwise force your exchange provider to keep your data secure.
评论 #43893593 未加载
评论 #43894176 未加载
_ink_6 天前
What does this mean for cold or hardware wallets?
评论 #43893449 未加载
amriksohata6 天前
US innovates CH replicates EU regulates<p>On a side note good luck in regulating Crypto that doesn&#x27;t require KYC when most people transfer to an anonymous wallet using a wallet address.
评论 #43898804 未加载
jmcgough6 天前
[flagged]
评论 #43893401 未加载
评论 #43893522 未加载
评论 #43893379 未加载
评论 #43893477 未加载
评论 #43893375 未加载
评论 #43893340 未加载
delusional6 天前
Finally. It&#x27;s a failed experiment by grifters and suckers. It had it&#x27;s chance at being useful, time to get it out of public conscience so we can work on actual issues.
评论 #43893504 未加载
评论 #43893850 未加载
评论 #43893677 未加载
bgwalter6 天前
The fact that Bitcoin itself has never been banned strongly suggests that it was government approved from the beginning or even developed at the NSA.<p>The tracking is a feature, and many governments want a CBDC.<p>What does the CIA think? The CIA thinks Bitcoin is great:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cointelegraph.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;bitcoin-price-million-cia-bitcoin-instutional-adoption-trends-ethereum-hodlers-digest&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cointelegraph.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;bitcoin-price-million-cia...</a>
评论 #43893542 未加载