TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Void: Open-source Cursor alternative

608 点作者 sharjeelsayed大约 11 小时前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;voideditor.com&#x2F;download-beta">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;voideditor.com&#x2F;download-beta</a>

56 条评论

bhuga12 分钟前
There&#x27;s so much happening in this space, but I still haven&#x27;t seen what would be the killer feature for me: dual-mode operation in IDE and CLI.<p>In a project where I already have a lot of linting brought into the editor, I want to be able to reuse that linting in a headless mode: start something at the CLI, then hop into the IDE when it says it&#x27;s done or needs help. I&#x27;d be able to see the conversation up to that point and the agent would be able to see my linting errors before I start using it in the IDE. For a large, existing codebase that will require a lot of guardrails for an agent to be successful, it&#x27;s disheartening to imagine splitting customization efforts between separate CLI and IDE tools.<p>For me so far, cursor&#x27;s still the state of the art. But it&#x27;s hard to go all-in on it if I&#x27;ll also have to go all-in on a CLI system in parallel. Do any of the tools that are coming out have the kind of dual-mode operation I&#x27;m interested in? There&#x27;s so many it&#x27;s hard to even evaluate them all.
评论 #43933461 未加载
BeetleB大约 8 小时前
Feedback 1: The README really needs more details. What does it do&#x2F;not do? Don&#x27;t assume people have used Cursor. If it is a Cursor alternative, does it support all of Cursor&#x27;s features?<p>As a non-Cursor user who does AI programming, there is nothing there to make me want to try it out.<p>Feedback 2: I feel any new agentic AI tool for programming should have a comparison against Aider[1] which for me is the tool to benchmark against. Can you give a compelling reason to use this over Aider? Don&#x27;t just say &quot;VSCode&quot; - I&#x27;m sure there are extensions for VSCode that work with Aider.<p>As an example of the questions I have:<p>- Does it have something like Aider&#x27;s repomap (or better)?<p>- To what granularity can I limit the context?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aider.chat&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aider.chat&#x2F;</a>
评论 #43930575 未加载
评论 #43931589 未加载
评论 #43932991 未加载
评论 #43930638 未加载
评论 #43930630 未加载
评论 #43930926 未加载
olalonde大约 10 小时前
It feels like everyone and their mother is building coding agents these days. Curious how this compares to others like Cline, VS Code Copilot&#x27;s Agent mode, Roo Code, Kilo Code, Zed, etc. Not to mention those that are closed source, CLI based, etc. Any standout features?
评论 #43929515 未加载
评论 #43928823 未加载
评论 #43932134 未加载
评论 #43929453 未加载
评论 #43928872 未加载
评论 #43931062 未加载
评论 #43930179 未加载
评论 #43928833 未加载
评论 #43929402 未加载
评论 #43928902 未加载
alisinabh大约 7 小时前
Zed (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;zed.dev&#x2F;agentic" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;zed.dev&#x2F;agentic</a>) also released agentic code edits (similar to Cursor) which I tried and really like.
评论 #43932072 未加载
评论 #43930543 未加载
fcoury大约 8 小时前
One thing I noticed is that there&#x27;s no cost tracking, so it&#x27;s very hard to predict how much you&#x27;re spending. This is fine on tools like Cursor that are all inclusive, but is something that is really necessary if you&#x27;re bringing your own API keys.<p>Is this feature on the roadmap?
评论 #43932177 未加载
nm980大约 10 小时前
Is there some benefit from forking vscode instead of creating an extension?
评论 #43929147 未加载
评论 #43928755 未加载
评论 #43928643 未加载
评论 #43929007 未加载
评论 #43929457 未加载
评论 #43929887 未加载
评论 #43928669 未加载
l-albertovich大约 5 小时前
I&#x27;ve just installed it and tried to have it create a hello world using gemma3:27b-it-qat through ollama but it refused to do it claiming it doesn&#x27;t have access to my filesystem.<p>Then I opened an existing file and asked it to modify a function to return a fixed value and it did the same.<p>I&#x27;m an absolute newb in this space so if I&#x27;m doing something stupid I&#x27;d appreciate it if you helped me correct it because I already had the C&#x2F;C++ extension complain that it can only be used in &quot;proper vscode&quot; (I imported my settings from vscode using the wizard) and when this didn&#x27;t work either it didn&#x27;t spark joy as Marie Kondo would say.<p>Please don&#x27;t get me wrong, I gave this a try because I like the idea of having a proper local open source IDE where I can run my own models (even if it&#x27;s slower) and have control over my data. I&#x27;m genuinely interested in making this work.<p>Thanks!
评论 #43932182 未加载
w10-1大约 8 小时前
May I ask why did you decide against starting with (Eclipse) Theia instead of VSCode?<p>It&#x27;s compatible but has better integration and modularity, and doing so might insulate you a bit from your rather large competitor controlling your destiny.<p>Or is the exit to be bought by Microsoft? By OpenAI? And thus to more closely integrate?<p>If you&#x27;re open-source but derivative, can they not simply steal your ideas? Or will your value depend on having a lasting hold on your customers?<p>I&#x27;m really happy there are full-fledged IDE alternatives, but I find the hub-and-spoke model where VSCode&#x2F;MS is the only decider of integration patterns is a real problem. LSP has been a race to the bottom, feature-wise, though it really simplified IDE support for small languages.
johnfn大约 10 小时前
This is very cool and I&#x27;m always happy to see more competition in this space. That said, two suggestions:<p>- The logo looks like it was inspired directly from the Cursor logo and modified slightly. I would suggest changing it.<p>- It might be wise to brand yourself as your own thing, not just an &quot;open source Cursor&quot;. I tend to have the expectation that &quot;open source [X]&quot; projects are worse than &quot;[X]&quot;. Probably unfair, I know.
评论 #43930290 未加载
评论 #43929098 未加载
sach1大约 3 小时前
How is it that the open source Cursor &#x27;alternative&#x27; doesn&#x27;t have a linux option (either via AppImage, as Cursor offers, or something like a flatpak). I understand that open source does not automatically mean linux, but it is like, weird right?
评论 #43933354 未加载
dang大约 10 小时前
Related:<p><i>Show HN: Void, an open-source Cursor&#x2F;GitHub Copilot alternative</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41563958">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41563958</a> - Sept 2024 (154 comments)
MantisShrimp90大约 8 小时前
Projects like this are great because open source versions need to figure out the right way to do things, rather than the hacky, closed, proprietary alternatives that pop up first and are just trying to consume as many users as possible to get a most quickly.<p>In that case, a shitty, closed system is good actually because it&#x27;s another thing your users will need to &quot;give up&quot; if they move to an alternative. By contrast, an open ide like void will hopefully make headway on an open interface between ides and the llm agents in such a way that it can be adapted by neovim people like me or anyone else for that matter
sunnybeetroot大约 9 小时前
Given Void is backed by Ycombinator, what’s the business plan to start generating revenue?
评论 #43929970 未加载
评论 #43929967 未加载
renjimen大约 4 小时前
As a data scientist, my main gripe with all these AI-centric IDEs is that they don’t provide data centric tools for exploring complex data structures inherent to data science. AI cannot tell me about my data, only my code.<p>I’ll be sticking with VSCode until:<p>- Notebooks are first class objects. I develop Python packages but notebooks are essential for scratch work in data centric workflows<p>- I can explore at least 2D data structures interactively (including parquet). The Data Wrangler in VSCode is great for this
评论 #43932167 未加载
almosthere大约 2 小时前
We gotta stop making full vscodes, and just make extensions... Bleh
helsinki大约 2 小时前
If this isn’t as good as or better than Avante.nvim, I’m going to be quite sad.
_pdp_大约 6 小时前
On a tangent, I get the feeling that the more senior you are, the less likely you are to end up using one of these VIDEs. If you do use any coding assistants at all, it will mostly be for the auto-complete feature - no &#x27;agent mode&#x27; malarkey.<p>Would you say this is true?
评论 #43931532 未加载
andrewmunsell大约 8 小时前
Given that there&#x27;s a dozen agentic coding IDEs, I only use Cursor because of the few features they have like auto-identification of the next cursor location (I find myself hitting tab-tab-tab-tab a lot, it speeds up repetitive edits). Are there any other IDEs that implement these QOL features, including Void (given it touts itself specifically as a Cursor alternative)?
评论 #43930206 未加载
评论 #43930172 未加载
hintymad大约 8 小时前
A trajectory question: do we still have the debate that whether open-source software takes away SDE jobs or makes the pie grow bigger to create more jobs? The booming OS community in the past seem have created multiple billion-dollar markets. On the other hand, we have a lot less growth than before now, and I was wondering if OSS has started to suppressing the demand of SDEs.
didip大约 6 小时前
Can you tell me what&#x27;s the difference between this and Continue?
amackera大约 10 小时前
I&#x27;ve got a great setup going with Emacs and Aidermacs[1]. I just can&#x27;t stand using VS Code, it&#x27;s impossible to configure to my liking.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;MatthewZMD&#x2F;aidermacs">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;MatthewZMD&#x2F;aidermacs</a>
评论 #43928520 未加载
评论 #43928510 未加载
ez8大约 2 小时前
Make it disable all the telemetry by default
hoakiet98大约 6 小时前
Been following this project from very earlier on. It&#x27;s awesome to see how much ground you covered in just a few months!
xwowsersx大约 10 小时前
Can you use OpenRouter with this?
评论 #43929750 未加载
评论 #43928602 未加载
评论 #43928490 未加载
setnone大约 9 小时前
This is realy cool and checks my privacy boxes, great name too. I will be testing it out and will consider contributing.<p>One thing i&#x27;d really like to have is a manual order for folders or even files in the explorer view.
zitterbewegung大约 6 小时前
Would be helpful for you to be in homebrew.
leogout大约 9 小时前
I subscribed to the mailing list of void long ago to be notified once the alpha opens, but i&#x27;ve never recieved anything. I forgot about it until today.
评论 #43929522 未加载
评论 #43929739 未加载
ahamilton454大约 7 小时前
The irony of an open source alternative to a fork of an open source project is hopefully not lost here
elric大约 10 小时前
Any particular reason why they forked VSCode and not Theia?
评论 #43928709 未加载
guybedo大约 8 小时前
fwiw here&#x27;s a more structured&#x2F;organized version of this thread: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;extraakt.com&#x2F;extraakts&#x2F;void-ai-coding-tool-discussion" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;extraakt.com&#x2F;extraakts&#x2F;void-ai-coding-tool-discussio...</a>
simultsop大约 7 小时前
The branding looks quiet strange and very conflicting with voidzero.dev
branon大约 3 小时前
Disappointing name! You are colliding with <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;voidlinux.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;voidlinux.org&#x2F;</a> among probably many other much more significant pieces of software.
wg0大约 6 小时前
And just that much maot each AI wrapper has.
tough大约 10 小时前
Oh wow this is nice, will try it out.<p>Ycombinator backed too I guess Vibe coding is here to stay
评论 #43929446 未加载
whatever1大约 6 小时前
Here have 10B$
mentalgear大约 9 小时前
Nice - also open competition is always good for users!
asynchronousx大约 5 小时前
If this supports connecting with locally hosted models this is actually a HUGE deal
nektro大约 8 小时前
one of these is gonna have malware and we&#x27;ll wonder how we never saw it
Demiurge大约 10 小时前
I don&#x27;t know anything about the project, I use Zed editor, but I think the logo is really cool.
soylentEnjoyer大约 8 小时前
BYOK<p>We live in the age of dev tools
badmonster大约 7 小时前
Congrats void!!
antirez大约 9 小时前
Mandatory reminder that &quot;agentic coding&quot; works way worse than just using the LLM directly, steering it ad needed, filling the gaps, and so forth. The value is in the semantical capabilities of the LLM itself: wrapping it will make it more convenient to use, but always less powerful.
评论 #43929599 未加载
moffkalast大约 8 小时前
&gt; Welcome to Void.<p>Flaskbacks to that pretty good Voyager episode.
apostle36大约 9 小时前
Open source and not available on Linux?
评论 #43929839 未加载
diamondfist25大约 9 小时前
I’ve been using Claude coder, I like this exp way more than these ai ides way more.
monoid73大约 9 小时前
Another one? People saw that 3B windsurf money.
cranberryturkey大约 2 小时前
no linux version? pfft. rookies
Inuit大约 9 小时前
Here comes another. Everyone saw that 3B Windsurf money and production go brrr
评论 #43931430 未加载
sampton大约 10 小时前
VSCode death by a thousand forks.
behnamoh大约 10 小时前
they always start as open source to bait users. how long until this one also turns into BaitWare? I hope it won&#x27;t since it&#x27;s backed by Y Combinator and has an Apache 2 license.
评论 #43928552 未加载
评论 #43928574 未加载
评论 #43928530 未加载
evo_9大约 9 小时前
If I move off Cursor, it&#x27;s def not going to be to another vs-code derivative. Zed has it right - build it from the ground up, otherwise, MS is going to kneecap you at some point.
评论 #43929027 未加载
评论 #43929069 未加载
评论 #43929164 未加载
dkersten大约 9 小时前
Yet another vscode fork…
jbellis大约 10 小时前
I created an OSS ai coding platform as well: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;brokk.ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;brokk.ai</a><p>But it&#x27;s a different take, Brokk is built to let humans supervise AI more effectively rather than optimizing for humans reading and writing code by hand. So it&#x27;s not a VS Code fork, it&#x27;s not really an IDE in the traditional sense at all.<p>Intro video with demo here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Pw92v-uN5xI" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Pw92v-uN5xI</a>
评论 #43930002 未加载
评论 #43928767 未加载
ramesh31大约 10 小时前
[flagged]
评论 #43928564 未加载
评论 #43928631 未加载
评论 #43928579 未加载
alp1n3-dev大约 9 小时前
The time to sell a VSCode fork for 3B was a week ago. If someone wants to move off of VSCode, why would they move to a fork of it instead of to Zed, JetBrains, or a return to the terminal?<p>Next big sale is going to be something like &quot;Chrome Fork + AI + integrated inter-app MCP&quot;. Brave is eh, Arc is being left to die on its own, and Firefox is... doing nothing.
freeamz大约 10 小时前
Why no linux build? It is just vscode in ts right? And it is an electron app right?
评论 #43929562 未加载
评论 #43928524 未加载
评论 #43928470 未加载