TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How the US built 5k ships in WWII

123 点作者 rbanffy2 天前

12 条评论

maxglute1 天前
Some #s.<p>39-45:<p>- US, pop 130m, 40m Gross Tons. ~0.05m GT&#x2F;m<p>2023:<p>- JP, 125m, 10m GT, ~0.08m GT&#x2F;m (kind of in decline)<p>- SKR, 51m, 18m GT, ~0.35m GT&#x2F;m (increasing in value)<p>- PRC, 1400m, 33 GT, ~0.02m GT&#x2F;m (increasing++ in GT and value)<p>If modern US was serious as efficient as JP or SKR, it can do 30-120m GT per year. Meanwhile PRC casually building about entire 6 year US WW2 ship building program per year (2024 puts it close to 37m GT). But it&#x27;s not out of question for US to be competitive in a few generations. But also kind of lulz that SKR peacetime ship building is like 7x more efficient than US during WW2.
评论 #43933299 未加载
评论 #43943727 未加载
评论 #43943779 未加载
评论 #43933408 未加载
评论 #43940238 未加载
treebeard9011 天前
The U.S. seems to think it can out manufacture a country like China, or another peer competitor, during a potential war. This does not seem to be the case anymore... That level of American wartime manufacturing just is not possible anymore.<p>Maybe robotics and AI can be combined to close the gap... Its just that all competitors will be able to do that too.<p>Then consider that much of the U.S. aligned shipbuilding happens in places like South Korea. There is no guarantee the U.S. will be able to purchase ships from South Korea during a war in Asia.<p>Then again, surface ships are quickly becoming obsolete with drones and hypersonic missiles.<p>If the U.S. wants to get ahead, they need to build submarine drone carriers as quickly as possible.
评论 #43933682 未加载
kristianp2 天前
Other things built quickly: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;patrickcollison.com&#x2F;fast" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;patrickcollison.com&#x2F;fast</a><p>I&#x27;m surprised this isn&#x27;t on the list.
评论 #43933245 未加载
评论 #43933911 未加载
TomMasz1 天前
I remember as a kid seeing the ghost fleet of Liberty Ships in the Hudson River near NYC. They gradually disappeared, with the last of them sold off in the early 70s. You could even buy parts like hatch covers from the ships in antique stores for a while until the supply dried up. It didn&#x27;t mean much to me but certainly did for my parents&#x27; generation.
jamestimmins1 天前
If you&#x27;re interested in the US war build up in general, Freedom&#x27;s Forge is an excellent read.
markus_zhang1 天前
Back then the US was the No. manufacturimg power, probably equals Britain and Germany combined and more.
评论 #43937821 未加载
hyruo1 天前
Radical goals, obedient workers, a peaceful environment on the continental, and the necessary industrialization capabilities all worked together to make this seemingly great thing happen.
评论 #43933071 未加载
Animats1 天前
The interesting claim in the article is that US ship production was <i>less</i> efficient in terms of man-hours as quantity went up. That&#x27;s unexpected.
评论 #43933997 未加载
评论 #43934055 未加载
jonstewart1 天前
When I first read, years ago, about how many aircraft carriers the US Navy had during WW2, I was gobsmacked. But then I read how most of them were escort carriers, slow converted merchant ships with just a few planes. The US military currently has a lot of exquisite platforms; what it [mostly] lacks today is mass from cheaper systems.<p>It’d be good if we built more submarines, faster…
评论 #43933195 未加载
评论 #43937873 未加载
renewiltord1 天前
Fortunately, these days with environmental law and historical protection the horrors of these shipyards will never again return. Give thanks. Our children won&#x27;t have to suffer its results.
评论 #43937755 未加载
评论 #43935193 未加载
jaqalopes2 天前
A friend and I were at the WW2 museum in New Orleans a couple years ago and he said something that really stuck with me. Amazed at an exhibit on wartime manufacturing, he turned to me and said, &quot;This is so unbelievable to me. To think what we accomplished when everyone in the country was pulling in the same direction. There&#x27;s no way that could happen anymore.&quot; I hardly want to glorify warfare, but he has a point. As a young person in our chaotic and ambiguous present day looking back into the haze of the past, there really is something incredibly romantic about the era of war mobilization. Ordinary people had a purpose simply assigned to them, and if nothing else I think it&#x27;s still the case that people in all eras crave purpose.
评论 #43932970 未加载
评论 #43933357 未加载
评论 #43934994 未加载
评论 #43932804 未加载
评论 #43932817 未加载
评论 #43933050 未加载
评论 #43933429 未加载
评论 #43933296 未加载
评论 #43933372 未加载
ilaksh1 天前
The context is that WWIII is basically a foregone conclusion? If there is a hot war between the US and China, that proves that humans aren&#x27;t fit to control the planet.<p>The only way this makes sense for people is if they are racists deep down and think that humans should compete like ant colonies.<p>Warfare is a total failure of management and society.<p>The human zoos of the future are not going to allow warfare or build up to it.<p>We have instantaneous global communication and translation.
评论 #43933811 未加载