TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Privacy concerns when using AI assistants for coding?

6 点作者 Kholin1 天前
I&#x27;ve recently seen some teams claim to use third-party AI assistants like Claude or ChatGPT for coding. Don&#x27;t they consider it a problem to feed their proprietary commercial code into the services of these third-party companies?<p>If you feed the most critical parts of your project to an AI, wouldn&#x27;t that introduce security vulnerabilities? The AI would then have an in-depth understanding of your project&#x27;s core architecture. Consequently, couldn&#x27;t other AI users potentially gain easy access to these underlying details and breach your security defenses?<p>Furthermore, couldn&#x27;t other users then easily copy your code without any attribution, making it seem no different from open-source software?

5 条评论

apothegm1 天前
In theory, these companies all claim they don’t use data from API calls for training. Whether or not they adhere to that is… TBD, I guess.<p>So far I’ve decided to trust Anthropic and OpenAI with my code, but not Deepseek, for instance.
ATechGuy大约 15 小时前
I believe enterprises that care about privacy are using private AI from big tech (say Github copilot), others may not care so much about it.
baobun1 天前
Especially under current US administration and geopolitical climate?<p>Yeah, we&#x27;re not doing that.<p>Also moved our private git repos and CIs to self-managed.
bhaney1 天前
&gt; The AI would then have an in-depth understanding of your project&#x27;s core architecture<p>God how I wish this were true
rvz1 天前
Don&#x27;t forget that your env API keys are getting read and sent to Cursor, Anthropic, OpenAI and Gemini as well.