TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why the Obvious Choice for a Boeing 757 Replacement Isn't So Obvious

16 点作者 rntn3 天前

6 条评论

actuallyalys3 天前
I would like to know why Boeing didn’t have a replacement ready when the 757 stopped being produced. I realize commercial planes are not consumer goods, but 2004 still seems like a long time ago. Thus I imagine having a 757 replacement sooner was the plan, so what derailed it?
quink3 天前
The US population is about 4% of the worldwide population.<p>Anybody who thinks that the aviation industry does or doesn’t do anything significantly different because of something that touches 4% for 4 years is probably in the market for some Ilyushin 96’s.
评论 #43949298 未加载
robocat3 天前
So rent the A321 instead of buying them? The tariffs apply to goods not services.
ashoeafoot3 天前
Obvious choice is to have a daughter company outside of the us that has airbus planes and flies the routes desired.
rsyring3 天前
&gt; Since, as you might imagine, the planes themselves are an airline&#x27;s biggest expenditure...<p>Is that true?<p>I&#x27;d have expected that, over the course of the life of a plane, the costs to fuel, maintain, or pay the humans associated with it&#x27;s flights would be bigger than the initial purchase cost.<p>Edit: ChatGPT thinks fuel is the biggest expense at 2-3x the original purchase price over the life of the aircraft.
评论 #43951611 未加载
评论 #43953692 未加载
评论 #43953469 未加载
cratermoon3 天前
The domestic passenger airline industry in the US is already in trouble. With the drop in travel thanks to the administration&#x27;s antics and tariffs on foreign goods, expect serious turbulence.