TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Satellite will have to be turned off when it floats over the US

19 点作者 howard9413 天前

5 条评论

perihelions3 天前
&gt; <i>&quot;“The primary frequency allocation in P band is for huge SOTR [single-object-tracking radars] Americans use to detect incoming intercontinental ballistic missiles. That was, of course, a problem for us,” Scipal says. To get an exemption from the ban on space-based P-band radars, ESA had to agree to several limitations, the most painful of which was turning the Biomass radar off over North America and Europe to avoid interfering with SOTR coverage.&quot;</i><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.technologyreview.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;04&#x2F;18&#x2F;1115388&#x2F;esa-airbus-biomass-mission-measure-earths-forests-from-orbit&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.technologyreview.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;04&#x2F;18&#x2F;1115388&#x2F;esa-airb...</a><p>I guess that&#x27;s referring to things such as these?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;PAVE_PAWS" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;PAVE_PAWS</a> (<i>&quot;...The radar operates in the UHF band between 420 - 450 MHz...&quot;</i>)
secondcoming3 天前
It&#x27;s embarrassing that a satellite designed by the ESA can&#x27;t be used over Europe.<p>I&#x27;ve read other information about ICBM-detecting satellites being triggered by the sun glinting off lakes having the same signature as an ICBM launch.<p>Surely the orbit of this satellite will be well known and so false positives alarms can be ruled out?<p>I suppose it&#x27;s possible that a bad actor could time a real ICBM launch to coincide with this satellite&#x27;s orbit to defeat Early Warning Systems, but then again they could just launch submarine-based ICBMs from the southern equator.
评论 #43958011 未加载
jasonlfunk3 天前
Why does the title only mention the US? It can’t do it over Europe either.
评论 #43957794 未加载
评论 #43965952 未加载
echoangle3 天前
Maybe my non-native English is showing but I’m having difficulty reading the article. First, it describes how the satellite can’t be used over the US and Europe and then says:<p>&gt; Still, this isn&#x27;t the worst setback. [… stuff how the satellite will be used over southern America …]<p>I was waiting for the description of an even worse setback, which makes the satellite even more limited, but it seems like „this isn’t the worst setback“ was supposed to mean „it’s not too bad, we can still do other useful stuff“. Was that understandable for native speakers?
评论 #43957772 未加载
评论 #43957719 未加载
评论 #43957699 未加载
评论 #43957668 未加载
评论 #43957657 未加载
评论 #43957800 未加载
fred_is_fred2 天前
A better title would be &quot;Recon satellite jammer launched by ESA&quot;.