A community-led fork of Organic Maps

The concern seems to be they want a bunch of guarantees about what will be done with the project - not because there <i>is</i> a change happening from Organic, but because they&#x27;re afraid of a change happening <i>in the future</i>. If such a change happens in the future, they can fork then. I mean, hell, this already happened; they had Maps.ME, it was sold, Roman forked it to Organic. If it gets sold again they can fork again. This seems like it&#x27;ll hurt the community more than if they&#x27;d waited until it was necessary.

I would be sceptical to this initiative too, as they never mentioned in their timeline on the co maps website that the reason the original Maps with me project was forked because the original one was sold. And not just sold, but sold to Russians, the infamous Mail ru group. Which is basically the KGB spying project led by a greasy oligarch.

What’s the backstory?<p>&gt; There was no real progress in negotiations with Organic Maps shareholders.<p>&gt; It appears that Viktor is only open to a guarantee not to sell the project, however besides that he wants to retain full control of Organic Maps.<p>&gt; And Organic Maps future is uncertain still, as the disagreement between shareholders (Viktor and Roman) has not been resolved.

<i>Again?</i><p>Wasn&#x27;t the whole thing about Organic Maps to be a community-led fork of maps.me?<p>So now we&#x27;re at a fork of a fork?

Sad to see the current state of mobile OSM-based apps. Maps.me becoming OrganicMaps, now this. Lot of development effort, great work going into it, but somehow, after years, the apps don&#x27;t feel more user-friendly.<p>I was pushing hard to replace Google Maps, but eventually, I gave up. OsmAnd is great if you need that &quot;swiss army knife of OSM apps&quot; on your phone, but I rarely do. Same with Maps.me&#x2F;Organic Maps, try to search for something, mistype only one letter (surprise, surprise, that happens a lot on mobile), and you have no chance to get results. Alternative path for your bike route? Forget about it. Rendering is awful, either ugly, or slow, or both.<p>I am trying to switch to Mapy.com (Mapy.cz before), it&#x27;s a surprisingly user friendly app, however, not sure how they are going to monetize soon. So far the best on phone, I hope they will push and really become a Maps-replacement. They recently switched from a Czech-focused concept to a proper world-wide map (mapy.com); both web and mobile is great so far. (I am not Czech, and have no relation to mapy, simply really like their app)<p>If OsmAnd got a new rendering engine (no, not that &quot;3D&quot; sluggish thing it has for a couple years now), like streetcomplete has (or the Strava-built-in mapbox renderer), it would be possibly the best.

Why do people contribute to Organic Maps and not to OSM?<p>I always assumed that Organic Maps was a sophisticated way to distribute OSM data, nothing more.

I&#x27;ve contributed a few trivial fixes to OrganicMaps and I found them to be pretty responsive and reasonable in their opinions. That doesn&#x27;t mean I agreed with all the decisions or priorities they make but that&#x27;s to be expected. Their leadership seemed sane enough to me. It certainly felt like close enough to a BDFL situation to me.<p>In the research I did, OrganicMaps was the only viable open alternative to something like Gaia and it wasn&#x27;t particularly close. It does a pretty good job of that, though their map styles leave some things to be desired and meter only topo lines is a bummer.<p>My limited experience playing around with the codebase made me appreciate that this isn&#x27;t a small or simple project. It is a huge mixed codebase of C&#x2F;Java&#x2F;etc to share rendering across platforms and even just the map file generation is no small thing.<p>Color me skeptical that a fork will get off the ground, this seems more likely to me that both projects will struggle for a good while longer. Announcing a fork is easy, delivering something with enough value beyond rhetoric that will draw users over is another.

I&#x27;m increasingly disaffected by the idea of BDFL-run projects.<p>The concept is appealing—it&#x27;s essentially Plato&#x27;s philosopher king. The BDFL can unstick decision making and ensure the project moves forward without having to litigate every decision in committee, they maintain context and vision throughout the life of the project, and <i>because</i> they&#x27;re not accountable to anyone they can make the right call for the project rather than having to make complicated political trade-offs. It&#x27;s all the perks of a monarchy.<p>Unfortunately, we&#x27;ve seen over and over again that the BDFL model <i>also</i> has all the problems of monarchy. If you get a good one it&#x27;s the most effective form of government, but people are fickle things. Frequently we see things like this, where the BDFL turns out to have been malevolent after all or decided that they <i>are</i> the project and are entitled to the sole profit from it. WordPress comes to mind.<p>A good BDFL is worth keeping, but I think we&#x27;ll find that drawing inspiration for our community structures from real-world democracies&#x2F;republics will be more stable and reliable in the long term and more generalizable across new projects. Democracies aren&#x27;t perfect, but by design they smooth out the variance of the individual humans in the community, giving you much more predictable results over time than monarchies do.

OrganicMaps is such a great app. I did not know it was owned by this type of organisation. I hope they sort it out.

A fork of a fork I guess, Organic Maps was originally `maps.me`, and I suppose we&#x27;re forking it again

Something I often wonder about forks, just as good practice...<p>Is anyone from the Organic Maps and OSM contributor communities familiar with the people forking this, and can vouch for their intentions and the necessity of forking?<p>How do we get confidence in that?

I would add a few points:<p>* Organic Maps devs are from Belarus, company is registered in Estonia. This is very difficult setup already, and I can imagine authors just want simplest setup possible. Perhaps they do not want to waste energy on nonprofit that is very very difficult and expensive to do internationally!<p>* If they sell the company so what? Create another fork and move on. It is opensource, but that does not mean authors can not get some money!<p>* Biggest expense for Organic Maps is hosting and mirroring map data. Is this fork going to use (and pay) their own servers?<p>* Is there list of developers and contributors behind this fork? I only found &quot;us&quot; and &quot;we&quot; and &quot;community&quot;!

I&#x27;m not sure I understand why an open source maps app needs shareholders in the first place?

Site still prompts to install organic maps app on mobile.

Sad how much good stuff gets destroyed by non-benevolent dictators and&#x2F;or greed.<p>Let&#x27;s hope a community-led fork does so well that OM becomes a footnote in history. Or it causes OM owners to make a U-turn (but who cares @ this point. Just go ahead with community-led effort).<p>Would need a new name though. How about a public-is-invited contest?

Related: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43705631">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43705631</a>

What&#x27;s the difference between Organic Maps&#x2F;this and OSMAnd?

funny, I had to abandon open maps,yesterday, for a fork, as they no longer have an english language version, that used to be hidden under &quot;tranport&quot;,which is now reduced to purple and green andessentialy no map info.

Wait, what, again? I thought Organic Maps was the &quot;good&quot;&#x2F;BDFL-led&#x2F;actually open fork of Maps.me that was bought and turned into malware?

A few people are talking about multiple issues in the open mapping space.<p>Today (bear with me), I was looking at a tool called SwiftWave it lets you run your own Platform as a Service. The only reason I mention it is that I found interesting how they’ve really broken the problem domain into a series of smaller open source projects.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;swiftwave.org&#x2F;docs&#x2F;contribution_guideline" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;swiftwave.org&#x2F;docs&#x2F;contribution_guideline</a><p>I’d love some folk riffing on how this may help, surely nice interfaces for cycling vs driving vs public transport don’t need to be reinvented across projects. How can diff apps work as an ecosystem to allow the brining together of more sophisticated apps that mirror the feature set of the large funded maps apps?