TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why I'm resigning from the National Science Foundation

226 点作者 jbegley大约 23 小时前

8 条评论

Onawa大约 22 小时前
As a federal contractor within NIH, I can tell you that the damage has already been done to the United States&#x27; dominance in science. Even if every action taken by current administration is reversed, the uncertainty for foreign scientists is too much. Many that I have spoken to are looking for their exit from either gov or academic research, or looking to leave the United States completely.<p>The Trump admins cuts are not likely to be reversed until at minimum 2029 if Democrats are able to take the White House. But the entire scientific pipeline has been disrupted. Science has always had &quot;passion profession&quot; tax, but at this point I would strongly recommend anyone pursuing life sciences or government research to either consider another field, or realize that you will most likely end up in industry.<p>Things are quite bleak right now...
评论 #43974485 未加载
评论 #43973896 未加载
评论 #43975962 未加载
评论 #43974095 未加载
评论 #43974133 未加载
评论 #43973846 未加载
评论 #43974203 未加载
评论 #43973818 未加载
评论 #43974279 未加载
评论 #43974182 未加载
vessenes大约 23 小时前
Good read; too long to sway public opinion though.<p>The most convincing and interesting thing I’ve read about the US’s science standing is just a reminder that it wasn’t always considered a global science leader. A few people saw the opportunity created by Nazi ideological purges of scientists and built, among other things, Princeton’s IAS.<p>Considered most charitably, the current administration sees itself as trying to return to an era of imperialism for the good of the country. In this area I wonder how resilient and immobile the scientific community is to these stresses. If I were in charge of science in a wealthy country right now I would be working overtime to brain drain US researchers.
评论 #43973573 未加载
评论 #43973598 未加载
评论 #43973630 未加载
评论 #43973651 未加载
评论 #43973571 未加载
评论 #43974100 未加载
评论 #43973565 未加载
评论 #43973511 未加载
评论 #43973591 未加载
howmayiannoyyou大约 22 小时前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=shFUDPqVmTg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=shFUDPqVmTg</a><p>Sabine highlights the problem with scientific funding in this video and it should be required watching before posting on this thread. Reform is needed. Some good will be tossed with a lot of bad. Its a cycle, a pendulum, and it will eventually tip to excess again sometime in the future. For now... fixing what is broken ought to be the priority.
评论 #43973744 未加载
评论 #43974370 未加载
评论 #43974460 未加载
评论 #43974091 未加载
评论 #43974278 未加载
nickledave大约 22 小时前
the tl;dr:<p>&gt; The NSF’s investments have shaped some of the most transformative technologies of our time—from GPS to the internet—and supported vital research in the social and behavioral sciences that helps the nation understand itself and evaluate its progress toward its democratic ideals. So in 2024, I was honored to be appointed to the National Science Board, which is charged under 42 U.S. Code § 1863 with establishing the policies of the Foundation and providing oversight of its mission. &gt; But the meaning of oversight changed with the arrival of DOGE. That historical tension—between the promise of scientific freedom and the peril of political control—may now be resurfacing in troubling ways. Last month, when a National Science Board statement was released on occasion of the April 2025 resignation of Trump-appointed NSF Director Sethuraman Panchanathan, it was done so without the participation or notice of all members of the Board.<p>&gt; Last week, as the Board held its 494th meeting, I listened to NSF staff say that DOGE had by fiat the authority to give thumbs up or down to grant applications which had been systematically vetted by layers of subject matter experts.<p>&gt; Our closed-to-the-public deliberations were observed by Zachary Terrell from the DOGE team. Through his Zoom screen, Terrell showed more interest in his water bottle and his cuticles than in the discussion. According to Nature Terrell, listed as a &quot;consultant&quot; in the NSF directory, had accessed the NSF awards system to block the dispersal of approved grants. The message I received was that the National Science Board had a role to play in name only.<p>I can&#x27;t sum up everything that&#x27;s wrong with this moment better than that.<p>This is not some necessary pain that comes with shaking up the system. This is a hostile takeover of the federal government by embarrassingly ignorant goons who think they know everything, just because they can vibe code an almost functional app. This is what happens when you have VCs huffing their own farts in their Signal echo chamber: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.semafor.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;04&#x2F;27&#x2F;2025&#x2F;the-group-chats-that-changed-america" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.semafor.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;04&#x2F;27&#x2F;2025&#x2F;the-group-chats-t...</a>. Congratulations, you buffoons, you have demonstrated there are scaling laws for footguns.
评论 #43978570 未加载
评论 #43974479 未加载
ChrisArchitect大约 22 小时前
Related:<p><i>NSF faces shake-up as officials abolish its 37 divisions</i><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43935913">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43935913</a>
amanaplanacanal大约 22 小时前
Evidently the president appointed one of his personal attorneys to be the new librarian of Congress. The library turned him away because Congress hasn&#x27;t approved him. It seems it&#x27;s becoming more of a clusterfuck just about every day.
评论 #43973924 未加载
评论 #43974964 未加载
评论 #43974159 未加载
User23大约 21 小时前
Scientists commit to politics. Election happens. Election has consequences. Shocker. To be fair conservatives warned about this for decades but nobody listened.<p>The only possible response to this propaganda piece are nodding along religiously or revulsion and disgust at the sheer intellectual dishonesty of it.<p>This kind of superficial performative nonsense is a big part of why the replication crisis is as bad as it is. And few scientists are willing to speak of that. I’d love to hear from the scientists whose careers were damaged or destroyed by this person. But I doubt I ever will.
评论 #43979513 未加载
评论 #43978295 未加载
评论 #43974618 未加载
gitroom大约 21 小时前
Damn, none of this feels new to me - just feels like every few years it&#x27;s some other mess hurting science. You ever think this stuff ever really gets fixed or we just keep going in circles forever?