TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

KDE is finally getting a native virtual machine manager called “Karton”

195 点作者 bundie7 天前

14 条评论

Aardwolf6 天前
Why &quot;finally&quot;?<p>To me, KDE&#x27;s job should be to organize and render windows, application launcher icons, and the like<p>If I want a virtual machine, I&#x27;ll use a virtual machine for that<p>All this &quot;KDE suite&quot; stuff and what not is unnecesarry - some of these are good pieces of software that I like to use, but there&#x27;s no reason they need any integration with a desktop environment (arguably a few basics like a file manager, VTE and plain text editor are expected and fine but in theory also can be wholly separate)<p>Also, any integration attempts like making the icons a common asset rather than each application have their own, _fail_ and make things worse, with these integrations applications less often have working icons at all, and more often have mistakes like black icons against a black background making them invisible
评论 #44030844 未加载
评论 #44031504 未加载
评论 #44031361 未加载
评论 #44030870 未加载
评论 #44030705 未加载
评论 #44030768 未加载
评论 #44051729 未加载
sph6 天前
I love how 95% of the comments are about anything but the effing article.<p>Looking forward to a new VM manager. virt-manager is what I use and it&#x27;s not very maintained: it still has issues on a HiDPI screen where scaling is all messed up. GNOME Boxes is both buggy and featureless in the usual GNOME sense, haven&#x27;t found much use for it. I think all the focus has been on the virsh CLI and we haven&#x27;t had a decent VM GUI in a while.
评论 #44036852 未加载
评论 #44051748 未加载
bdbenton52556 天前
I use Arch and love KDE Plasma. It even has a blue light filter. Am never going back to Windows. KDE runs faster, looks nicer, does not have forced adware and telemetry. Great daily driver.
评论 #44026065 未加载
评论 #44028149 未加载
评论 #44025858 未加载
评论 #44029826 未加载
shmerl7 天前
Nice!<p>I&#x27;ve been using virt-manager for a long time, but more KDE native solution is welcome.<p>Still waiting for virt-manager to add support for Vulkan rendering through libvirt.<p>Side note, not sure if it&#x27;s specific to Kirigami, but a bunch of interfaces which use it have this excessive margin spacing feel to them.<p>Something like that happens with print-manager&#x27;s configuration which is using Kirigami supposedly too.
hxorr6 天前
I hope they can come up with a solution integrated into KDE where you can have apps running on a VM but appearing as a native Kwin window... Would probably need a helper daemon running on guest OS.<p>I know a similar thing has been done before but would be great to have upstream support from a major DE
评论 #44031202 未加载
评论 #44027697 未加载
评论 #44029323 未加载
评论 #44026232 未加载
评论 #44026196 未加载
fishgoesblub7 天前
Nice, having a new alternative to virt-manager is great, especially a Qt one. Unfortunate it&#x27;s using Kirigami and Qt Quick, I always felt the appearance and functionality is much worse compared to Qt Widgets.
评论 #44025193 未加载
评论 #44025398 未加载
评论 #44026239 未加载
评论 #44025214 未加载
brokegrammer6 天前
What KDE needs isn&#x27;t new features but less bugs.
评论 #44031231 未加载
评论 #44030218 未加载
vitorgrs6 天前
I really like KDE in general, and how full featured it is, but their design just feels dated compared to all modern OSes and other DMs on Linux...<p>The only reason why I&#x27;m a gnome user, it&#x27;s because of that.<p>And yes, I know I can just customize, but everytime I try, it just make KDE more sluggish for some reason, and doesn&#x27;t really feels natural.
评论 #44031131 未加载
评论 #44027169 未加载
评论 #44027418 未加载
评论 #44058052 未加载
评论 #44027683 未加载
pipallweek5 天前
Karton is a welcome development—there’s definitely a gap in the Linux desktop space for a VM manager that feels native, lightweight, and user-friendly without sacrificing features. virt-manager is still functional but hasn’t kept pace with modern UX expectations, and GNOME Boxes has taken the opposite route: sleek but lacking power-user features.<p>KDE’s approach could strike a balance, especially if they leverage Qt&#x27;s flexibility and KDE’s existing system integration. I’m cautiously optimistic—if Karton stays focused and avoids becoming bloated, it could fill a long-standing need for developers and desktop users alike. The key will be how well it handles real-world edge cases (HiDPI, GPU passthrough, multi-VM workflows, etc.).
dengolius6 天前
Do we really need another GUI for kvm&#x2F;qemu? I thought <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cockpit-project.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cockpit-project.org</a> cover the idea to develop something like Karton, but who am I to think so =)
评论 #44032746 未加载
评论 #44029333 未加载
bandrami6 天前
What ever happened to aqemu? That was my favorite frontend but it seems to have been languishing for a decade.
评论 #44030194 未加载
hagbard_c7 天前
Karton, Dutch for &#x27;cardboard&#x27;. Chosen because it is a tool to handle (virtual) boxes, maybe?
评论 #44025025 未加载
评论 #44032765 未加载
评论 #44025292 未加载
LargoLasskhyfv1 天前
Rappelkiste bzw. <i>&quot;Es rappelt in der Kiste!&quot;</i> :-)
Jotalea6 天前
Karton, sounds like &quot;cartón&quot; but with the traditional K added to the start of the names in KDE programs.
评论 #44025959 未加载
评论 #44025837 未加载