The title is misleading since the blog author admits to not having tried Racket recently. IMHO, Racket fixes the author's key complaint about documentation by having a Guide (separate from Reference) with many examples: <a href="http://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/index.html</a><p>Since Racket isn't Scheme, it also comes with more data structures built-in and there's on-going work to better support numerical computation.