TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Comparative Productivity of Programming Languages | Dr Dobb's

17 点作者 rohshall将近 13 年前

4 条评论

softbuilder将近 13 年前
For those who read the comments before the content, ABORT ABORT! It's not even worth your time to read about why it's not worth your time.
评论 #4415895 未加载
Lasher将近 13 年前
Agree with Softbuilder. Treating all function points equally and trying to come up with a generic "programming hours per fp" is about as useful as asking "How heavy is a rock?"
brentashley将近 13 年前
The list of languages covered made me look at the date on the article. I was almost certain it would be pre-y2k.<p>Sounds like a blinkered enterprise Java-centric worldview to me. To have ASP as the only scripting environment listed is just plain crazy in 2012. If you're going to include scripting at all, where are Ruby, Python, Perl, PHP, Javascript? If you want to talk about the productivity boost from high-level languages, you have to include these.
评论 #4417102 未加载
评论 #4417098 未加载
tikhonj将近 13 年前
Now I know not to use Cobol for my next project, with data to back that up. Progress.