TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Japan Commits to Eliminating Nuclear Power

36 点作者 jackds超过 12 年前

6 条评论

Zebra0815超过 12 年前
I'm a German and therefore do have another opinion :p<p>The anti-nuclear movement is not based on anti-scientific and scaremongering - we have Nobel price winners who support that cause and wrote scientific papers of this very issue.<p>The question asked by them is different from the topic you guys are talking about currently:<p>* What happens to the radioactive stuff that is created at the end of every of the energy producing process? We're not even able to keep information over thousands of years, how can we be able to big a hole and protect the environment (and our children's children) from radioactive rubbish? If this material is able to somehow get in contact with groundwater we do have a big problem for a whole region. In Germany we do still have forests that none is allowed to eat any fungi - because of Chernobyl which was about 20 years ago and hundreds of miles away...<p>The storage of radioactive material is a huge problem which isn't solved nowadays. Look at the amount of permanent disposal facilities: there is not a single one for that on the whole world. Even the USA do only have temporary facilities to store there highly radioactive material....<p>The 2nd problem is trivial: I do not assume that nuclear power plants are unsafe by default. I really do think that it's hard to crash one and bring it to the point of no return where everything blows up. But we saw a few times that it happened. That's technology, it's never a 100% safe. And that's also my problem. If something happens its not only an accident with a few people hurt but a massive disaster where several hundred people are radioactively contaminated, a whole region is uninhabitable and even your children's children have a great chance to give birth to disabled babies.<p>As I said...it's not that simple. There are a lot of questions still unanswered and this is what we currently see in Japan and saw in Eastern Europe 20 years before. The people will suffer and not only a few years but for generations. If we're able to build more efficient devices and to create other sources of power creation we definitely should do that as we're able to get rid of the (highly unlikely) chance that such a disaster is happening again.<p>If there are alternatives so why don't we use them? Let's see if it is enough technology out there to generative the energy we need. If no one tries, no one knows - there are studies for both sides of this issue but we do have to at least try it...
评论 #4525681 未加载
评论 #4525715 未加载
评论 #4525646 未加载
orangecat超过 12 年前
For all the scorn that creationists (justifiably) receive, scientific ignorance in the form of nuclear scaremongering has done and is doing far more damage.
评论 #4525522 未加载
brg超过 12 年前
From a distance this seems like a horrible decision. Nuclear power is one of the areas that Japan leads the world, both in expertise and operation. It runs 50 plants, third to only the US and France. It is amazing that as a society they would abandon this advantage.
评论 #4525551 未加载
评论 #4525546 未加载
评论 #4526207 未加载
se85超过 12 年前
Japan will figure it out!<p>I personally think it's a good idea.<p>I don't have a problem with Nuclear energy (under the right conditions).<p>I can't help but remind myself that having so many older nuclear reactors in such a small country that is densely populated (relatively speaking of course) and also sitting on a fault line, is NOT a good area to be using nuclear energy
please_no超过 12 年前
Whatever. Nuclear power is awesome when properly designed and implemented. They might as well use a combination of geothermal and hydrokinetic power from their volcano and beaches, and really cause harm to their Island.<p>Where else are they going to get portable, eco-friendly, and cheap (long run) power?<p>The Sun?
bluedanieru超过 12 年前
Here's where I'm at now on nuclear power, as someone who has lived in Tokyo for the last 7 1/2 years:<p>'Nuclear scaremongers' are right, that is to say they have a point, but for the wrong reasons. They are wrong that nuclear power is inherently dangerous, or that it's bad for the environment when compared e.g. coal, or basically whatever other anti-scientific bullshit they care to trot out to support their anti-nuclear stance. The science is clear - if you are an environmentalist you should fervently support nuclear power generation because it stands head and shoulders above everything else in terms of safety and environmental friendliness...<p><i>... when operated responsibly.</i><p>Therein lies the problem. After what's come out over the past couple years about the shit that has gone on at Tepco and the regulatory authorities, it is hard not to take the view that most of these assholes in executive positions should be put in prison. Hell, if Japan is so dedicated to the death penalty, some of them make prime candidates for it. That they could show such casual disregard not just for the safety of the towns near their facilities, but really their entire nation and even region, is profoundly shocking to the point that it starts to make you question your fundamental assumptions of human nature. Fundamental assumptions such as "human beings are generally not, as a rule, criminally incompetent psychopaths".<p>I'm sure most of the anti-nuclear crowd in Japan truly believes the bunk science that supports their stance. Others might be more cynical. At the governmental level, however, I think (and hope) something a bit more introspective is going on. Namely, that <i>they have come to the realization that they can not be trusted to effectively regulate the nuclear power industry</i>. Not when the consequences of failure are what they are.
评论 #4525778 未加载
评论 #4525588 未加载
评论 #4526135 未加载
评论 #4525690 未加载
评论 #4525895 未加载