TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

My Brush With a Patent Troll

221 点作者 ivancdg超过 12 年前

8 条评论

davyjones超过 12 年前
"The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying."<p>- John Carmack
评论 #4553783 未加载
评论 #4554011 未加载
ZeroGravitas超过 12 年前
Has anyone got a theory as to why video and video streaming seem particularly prone to patent trolls? A few years ago people might have accepted the answer that "they're really complicated", but I think we all accept now that patents are pretty much BS. So there must be some other incidental business reason why so many people went and filed patents on these ideas. Because Hollywood has lots of money and a reliance on video but no tech understanding maybe?
评论 #4553690 未加载
评论 #4553867 未加载
评论 #4553677 未加载
评论 #4554137 未加载
评论 #4554495 未加载
评论 #4554788 未加载
a-priori超过 12 年前
So I had an idea the other day for a patent reform: property tax on patents.<p>As long as a company wants to keep the monopoly rights over a patented invention, they are taxed a percentage of the patent's market value each year. They can choose either to pay that tax or sell the patent to someone else.<p>The government would offer to buy any patent for its market value, using tax revenue gathered from other patents, in doing so putting the invention into the public domain.<p>This would discourage companies from building large 'defensive' patent portfolios, since they'd be expensive to maintain. It works for the 'lone inventor' scenario too, since the market value of a new, untried invention would be low.<p>Once a patent's value is proven by developing the patent, its value will rise. At some point, the benefit derived from the patent's monopoly rights will no longer be worth the cost, and the rational thing to do is sell the invention.
easy_rider超过 12 年前
This guy literally "saved" GeoCities hah. (dutch) <a href="http://webwereld.nl/nieuws/64140/nederlander-redt-geocities.html" rel="nofollow">http://webwereld.nl/nieuws/64140/nederlander-redt-geocities....</a>
macchina超过 12 年前
I can see allowing a patent on software to the extent the invention incorporates a truly novel and interdependent physical component. But plain software patents are, for the most part, bogus and ought to be outright eliminated. There is no dearth of software innovation, and the litigation is twice as expensive as development.
denzil_correa超过 12 年前
The Stack Exchange "Ask Patents" sound a very good idea for such cases. People can be more aware like the OP.
shasta超过 12 年前
Just to clarify, the <i>idea</i> of video in the browser wasn't novel. Your implementation was novel and might even have been the first instance of the general idea, but the only way you could claim such an obvious idea as novel would be to have invented the browser.
Tipzntrix超过 12 年前
I'm glad we have such staunch defenders here and at the head of the Patent Office. This is nice to read, and Ask Patents is a great concept that perhaps you can be a part of.