TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Cloudant on Google's Spanner

69 点作者 mlmilleratmit超过 12 年前

7 条评论

soldermont001超过 12 年前
Here's an excellent talk on Spanner by one of the developers, Alex Lloyd: <a href="http://vimeo.com/43759726" rel="nofollow">http://vimeo.com/43759726</a>
smoyer超过 12 年前
Spanner is quite impressive and I remember wondering if any of the cloud hosting companies would attempt to match it. The problem of synchronizing atomic clocks and GPS is itself not trivial (remember the faster-than-light photons at CERN?), but there are plenty of other challenges too.
评论 #4563031 未加载
jauer超过 12 年前
I don't know that deploying precise timing is as big of a blocker as one might think[1]. Precise timing is commonly deployed in telecom networks for TDM &#38; RF signal synchronization. There is even a standard for distributing time sync over a ethernet network (IEEE 1588). This has become a big deal as cell site backhaul transitions from SONET to ethernet. On the Wireless ISP side there are companies that make low cost (sub $200) timing devices to synchronize wireless transmission to reduce self-interference, although that is based around 1PPS edge triggering instead of time of day clocking.<p>[1] Of course this assumes you have control over the physical environment and can install a GPS antenna in your datacenter. This rules out 3rd party clouds.
评论 #4563210 未加载
wamatt超过 12 年前
Spanner appears to raise the bar on globally distributed DB's, in the process making it desirable to a number of application developers.<p>Which raises the question of whether Google will make Spanner available to 3rd parties... (hope so!)
alexro超过 12 年前
The difference between NoSql and RDBMS is getting thinner and thinner with each progressive development. For most of the businesses Spanner is already covering all their needs. Going forward I'm anticipating db management systems to just have a switch "prefer consistency" or "favour partitioning" with the core functionality be the same.
lucian1900超过 12 年前
I find it interesting that several groups are converging on similar decisions. CouchDB, Spanner and Datomic have versioned data, with all versions immutable. All support some manner of offline operations. They do have different ways to resolve conflicts: manually, time-based and explicitly, respectively.
VonGuard超过 12 年前
Clearly Spanner is of interest, as every single NoSQL and DB startup has been blogging and making statements about it.