TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Wobbly Compiz

12 点作者 critic超过 16 年前

3 条评论

decode超过 16 年前
I know it's stupid to respond seriously to a comedy troll piece, but I can't resist:<p>Were there people that thought Compiz would make lots of people adopt Linux? That's kinda silly.<p>I like Compiz. It makes my desktop look nicer than Windows or OSX. But that's not why it's cool.<p>Compiz has two different kinds of plugins: pure eye-candy toys, and useful stuff. The wobbly windows, rain effect, and fire plugins are toys and are fun for about 5 minutes. You enable them to see what clever people can do to your desktop on modern hardware. Then you disable them.<p>In the second category are actual useful plugins. Virtual desktops are fantastic, but I've found it hard to explain the concept to non-technical people. Show them the Cube plugin for 10 seconds and it makes complete sense. The Zoom plugin is great for people with bad eyesight. Also, if you come across a flash video you can't fullscreen, just zoom in so it fills the screen. I do this with Pandora when I'm not using the computer so I can read the song and artist information from across the room. The Scale plugin is better than Exposé. The Group and Tab Windows plugin introduces new and useful ideas to window management.<p>Compiz is cool because the developers can be creative and experimental with new UI ideas. Maybe some of them don't end up working out (e.g. writing on the backs of windows seems like it might be really useful, but I've never found a good use for it), but some of them have changed how I've thought about the desktop interface.
评论 #458253 未加载
Tichy超过 16 年前
Yawn - wasn't there another article on HN recently that explained how hate articles always get 100 times the traffic as love articles? Don't fall for this troll...
评论 #458200 未加载
marksutherland超过 16 年前
Sigh. Why submit this pointless troll of an article when the LWN article it cites has actual information, content and details?
评论 #458196 未加载