TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Discovery Channel's Inside a Jet Crash

70 点作者 twakefield超过 12 年前

9 条评论

btilly超过 12 年前
Interesting article. For me the two most surprising takeaways were that most people survive an accident, and the other was how cheap the plane was.<p>They paid $400,000 for the plane. By comparison they paid $150,000 each for each of 3 test dummies in the plane. The test dummies cost more than the plane!
评论 #4604923 未加载
评论 #4605073 未加载
js2超过 12 年前
The article references the Sioux City Crash, aka United Flight 232. If you've never read it, this speech by that flight's captain (Al Haynes) is spellbinding:<p><a href="http://www.clear-prop.org/aviation/haynes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.clear-prop.org/aviation/haynes.html</a>
评论 #4605423 未加载
nostromo超过 12 年前
Interesting that they seem to be confirming previous analysis that shows that the rear of the plane is indeed the safest part of the plane.<p>&#62; flying in first class would have been fatal. Passengers in the middle of the cabin might have suffered concussions and broken ankles, while those in the rear could have walked away<p>which agrees with this analysis <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/aviation/safety/4219452" rel="nofollow">http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/aviation/safety/4...</a> which says<p>&#62; the trend was clear: The rear cabin (seats located behind the trailing edge of the wing) had the highest average survival rate at 69 percent. The overwing section had a 56 percent survival rate, as did the coach section ahead of the wing. First/business-class sections (or in all-coach planes, the front 15 percent) had an average survival rate of just 49 percent.
评论 #4605900 未加载
chmars超过 12 年前
Please link to the single page version:<p><a href="http://m.usatoday.com/article/news/1606749?preferredArticleViewMode=single" rel="nofollow">http://m.usatoday.com/article/news/1606749?preferredArticleV...</a>
weaksauce超过 12 年前
&#62; The plane was going 140 mph at impact, which is close to regular landing speed. But the 727 was descending at 1,500 feet per minute, much faster than the 10 to 20 feet per minute of a typical airliner landing.<p>I have to imagine that they were thinking seconds instead of minutes. coming down from 35k feet would take quite a long time if that was not the case. (20'/min would take ~30 hours)
评论 #4604682 未加载
评论 #4604676 未加载
评论 #4604802 未加载
评论 #4604895 未加载
captaintacos超过 12 年前
Who would've thought. Ironically, flying economy might someday save your life (if Economy Class Syndrome doesn't kill your first that is).
omgsean超过 12 年前
Great, now if I ever get to fly first class I won't be able to enjoy it.
jser超过 12 年前
Glad to see the advertising dollars from Honey Boo Boo went towards something useful!
sek超过 12 年前
The Nissan advertising before the crash video was funny.