TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

"Traffic is not enough to make any real money"

4 点作者 Fuca超过 16 年前
I found this phrase while reading this thread:<p>http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=461296<p>Do you think this is true? If so I am wasting my time.

4 条评论

eli超过 16 年前
If you have lots of highly qualified niche traffic -- the kinds of people that advertisers actually want to reach -- along with a solid in-house ad sales team, you can make quite a bit of money off even a moderate traffic site.<p>If you have tons of traffic, but you know nothing about the audience, you will get very little money for your ads. Why do you think the washingtonpost.com has to run ads for home refinancing and mesothelioma ambulance chasers? Because there aren't many advertisers willing to pay a premium to target "any schmuck reading the newspaper."<p>Advertisers aren't stupid. CPM rates have basically been comditized unless there's something special about your site or your advertising model/targeting.
timf超过 16 年前
I don't think it's possible to make any universal statement about it. We could make guesses at the ratio of how many people with this business model become successful with it or not (this depends on your costs and profit objectives of course). But it certainly <i>can</i> be done.<p>The "profit objectives" part of that is pretty important. What do you consider "real" money. On the low end, there are a lot of people making salary-level income on content driven sites + adwords. Personally, I'd be pretty happy with that as a start (freedom) and go from there.
评论 #462719 未加载
评论 #462874 未加载
icey超过 16 年前
I would rather have the traffic and not need it than need the traffic and not have it.
gojomo超过 16 年前
The poster was talking about <i>his</i> project's traffic, not traffic in general.