TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Introducing the new compose in Gmail

288 点作者 derpenxyne超过 12 年前

44 条评论

jsdalton超过 12 年前
I hate being the guy who sidetracks a thread off the bat by complaining about something unrelated, but...<p>Whatever blogspot theme Google uses for this blog is just god awful (oh, I see, this is it: <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.co.uk/p/as-you-may-have-noticed-gmail-blog-has.html" rel="nofollow">http://gmailblog.blogspot.co.uk/p/as-you-may-have-noticed-gm...</a>), and I swear it gets worse every time I view a post there.<p>To wit:<p>When I load the page I see the orange "loading" gears. Then that sliiiiides up to reveal the content. Really? Can they really not innovate here? This is a company that spends massive amounts of resources to get their homepage to load as quickly as possible. Heck, they even penalize companies in their index with slow loading times. And yet they purposefully add loading animations and transitions which add <i>at least</i> a second to page load, and probably more as far as time it takes me to engage in the content.<p>Also, every time I reload the page I see something different. Sometimes there is text in the black menu bar. Sometimes there is not. Sometimes there is an "extra" screen that slides up after the orange loading gears, sometimes not. Sometimes the sidebar navigation is there, sometimes not. Try refresh a few times yourself and you'll see.<p>Also, I love the five-second delay for the document URL update when you navigate via the sidebar.<p>All of these fancy, look-we're-using-ajax, gee-whiz-its-a-single-page-app features -- just for a simple blog post. Talk about complicating a simple problem!<p>Again, apologies for the rant but I couldn't even concentrate on what the blog post was saying because I was so distracted by this garbage.
评论 #4719162 未加载
评论 #4718175 未加载
评论 #4719146 未加载
评论 #4718529 未加载
评论 #4718202 未加载
评论 #4718882 未加载
评论 #4718831 未加载
评论 #4721985 未加载
评论 #4718115 未加载
评论 #4719329 未加载
评论 #4720048 未加载
评论 #4720100 未加载
评论 #4718098 未加载
评论 #4721121 未加载
评论 #4718128 未加载
nkurz超过 12 年前
<i>Saving a draft, opening the old email, and then reopening your draft wastes valuable minutes. The new compose pops up in a window, just like chats (only larger).</i><p>Minutes? I do sometimes wonder where the day goes...<p>Alternatively, Shift-click on compose (or press capital C to with keyboard shortcuts on), and you'll get an actual window that you can move and resize. With the chat mini-windows I frequently wish that I could adjust them, and often accidentally collapse them by clicking in what looks like a title bar.<p>Or if you already have a message open, just shift-click on Inbox to open a new window. Or not --- Google in their wisdom has disabled that to prevent confusing some poor soul with a broken shift key, praise be their servers. But C-n for a new window, ma-return, /search, C-w isn't that bad.<p>I like the idea of minimizing the address area, but don't understand the advantages of the new approach. Is it primarily for tablet compatibility? Or is the concept of windows still considered unteachable? And why are they decreasing support for traditional click modifiers?
评论 #4718222 未加载
评论 #4719318 未加载
评论 #4718422 未加载
评论 #4719663 未加载
评论 #4718214 未加载
评论 #4718224 未加载
评论 #4718299 未加载
tomasien超过 12 年前
I can see the merits of this, but I'm curious about how it fits into a mobile strategy.<p>My big complaint about email, especially gmail, is that it seems to insist on keeping too many elements from desktop to mobile. My mobile email needs are much more like my SMS needs, yet the UX for mobile Gmail (for example) largely resembles the desktop client.<p>I know that's tangential, but it's what's on my mind regarding Gmail right now.
评论 #4718079 未加载
codeulike超过 12 年前
I prefer Gmail since its redesign back in April.<p>There, I said it.
评论 #4718621 未加载
asadotzler超过 12 年前
Is this really a step forward? It feels a little bit like a step backwards -- more like classic email clients and less like Gmail.
评论 #4718056 未加载
评论 #4718309 未加载
评论 #4718078 未加载
评论 #4718047 未加载
manaskarekar超过 12 年前
Does anyone have a comprehensive/good solution to how to move all your stuff out of Gmail?<p>Midway while typing this post, I did a search and boom: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3581613" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3581613</a>
评论 #4721072 未加载
评论 #4718981 未加载
joshmlewis超过 12 年前
You can still open up emails in the larger view, If I'm not mistaken. I can see and have experienced the issue they are attempting to solve here and this seems like an ok solution. I guess we won't know until we try it. Most emails are short however, at least that should be your goal unless it's something more detailed and then you have a larger canvas to work with.
levesque超过 12 年前
I think they should add a maximize button to this window. Sometimes you just want to edit one email in full screen, and I don't think you should have to revert to the previous interface to do that.
评论 #4722200 未加载
dredmorbius超过 12 年前
And ... addressing the content of this blog post: yet another reason mutt wins as a mail client.<p>Open mutt (preferably under screen so you can 'C-a "' between mail folders), view message(s) you want to reference (optionally: tag relevant messages, using mutt's filtering tools as necessary, than 'l ~T' to restrict to just the tagged messages, allowing you to rapidly reference a set of messages.<p>Fire up a new terminal window (I bind this to '&#60;shift&#62;&#60;alt&#62;t' in my window manager) and write "mutt -s 'subject line'" to start your message, drop into the address lookup window to designate recipients, and edit away in your editor of choice.<p>And all of this without the multi-gigabyte overhead of a full browser session + gmail.<p>Oh yeah: offlineimap means you can work on your GMail account (and/or any other accounts you've configured for mutt) readily.<p>Just sayin'.
评论 #4719415 未加载
blhack超过 12 年前
Good.<p>The most annoying thing to me about gmail's interface is center-clicking on something (to reference it, like something in a mailing list) and having the entire window redirected.<p>This is cool :)
评论 #4718480 未加载
评论 #4718082 未加载
munaf超过 12 年前
Interesting that they took this approach primarily for email referencing. Is it that common of a use case that it's worth changing the entire experience around it (and collapsing the formatting bar, etc.)? I'm assuming they tested some sort of referencing UI in the existing compose screen. Wish I could see that. Also, I'm wondering how image insertion works; modals upon modals can be pretty awkward for users.<p>My real pet peeve: can we start removing "Compose" from email vocabulary?
tolos超过 12 年前
Ahhh, it's good to see more useful desktop features making their way online (how old is multi-tasking?). Now we wait for the gmail OS that can run applications...
fcoury超过 12 年前
I would really appreciate if Google took some time to work on the speed issues we now experience with Gmail instead of working on this cosmetic changes.<p>I use Gmail basically ever since it was on early early stages (I even pay for more storage for years now) and the degradation of performance is the one thing that makes me think of leaving the service for something snappier.
评论 #4718606 未加载
dquigley超过 12 年前
It seems like many people don't like this, but I had this exact issue last night. And opening another tab takes a while to load simply because the gmail app is so big. So while I'm not sure about this exact implementation yet, it could be a nice feature.
nixarn超过 12 年前
I think it looks great. Many times I've opened gmail in another tab to find some info.
acabal超过 12 年前
On a meta-note, I hate, hate HATE how this blog and G+ blog posts hijack the space bar. I use spacebar as page down and it never works in G+, and it doesn't on this blog either.
评论 #4718332 未加载
stephenhuey超过 12 年前
I will enjoy this a lot, because I do often save drafts to go looking for some other message in my inbox. However, I think it saves valuable seconds, not minutes. :-)
karpathy超过 12 年前
I welcome this change if they implement it well. I sometimes keep two gmail windows open so that I can compose in one while I reference emails or search in the other.
aneth4超过 12 年前
Does anyone else suffer from EXTREMELY slow gmail. This happens for me across all devices, browsers, and even IMAP. 30+ seconds to load messages sometimes and lots of 17, 317 and 503 errors.<p>I've tried every recommendation, and of course hear nothing back from their support or in their forums. Gmail is almost unusable for me now.<p>Any recommendations or contacts would be appreciated. It seems the only way to get help from Google is to know someone.
评论 #4720167 未加载
jmilloy超过 12 年前
Ugh. Gmail continues to roll out new features and arbitrary tweaks, yet the bugs impeding normal tasks continues to grow. I've said it before: can I just have gmail beta back?<p>(The main ones for me are the compose window never actually loading, or new messages in a thread not displaying (both requiring a refresh). Meanwhile, the chat hover has changed layout twice. Seriously?)
sasoon超过 12 年前
I tried it and it is annoying. Compose window is located in the lower right corner of the screen, and cannot be moved to the middle.
ImprovedSilence超过 12 年前
Does anyone know if there's a way to try this out before they roll it out? It doesn't mention anything about it on the blog.
elionchin超过 12 年前
Speaking on a tangent. Has anybody not found it annoying that you can't auto-BCC yourself in Gmail? Only if you do so does it pull up the message thread to the top which I prefer to keep track of timelines. I would be fine without the BCC as long as the thread reflects my response time. Either way, room for improvement.
mdonahoe超过 12 年前
Does anyone else get annoyed when replying to threads with multiple people?<p>I always want to reply to the most recent message, but usually someone else responds while I am composing. So I have to view their message and reply to that instead of to the original message. Does this happen to anyone else, or am I taking crazy pills?
评论 #4718707 未加载
Cataclysmic超过 12 年前
What gmail really needs to change is the "reply" box. When I'm composing a regular email I get a nice big box in which to type my email. When I'm typing a reply email I just have a little tiny (vertically tiny) box to type my reply. Why?????? So annoying.
eric5544超过 12 年前
That looks great!<p>It feels to me though that google is still playing serious catch-up to it's main competitors (yahoo &#38; microsoft) in the email arena who both have great web-mail solutions that don't get the accolades they deserve.<p>Now all I need is full folder support and I'm happy!
评论 #4718664 未加载
评论 #4722170 未加载
ilcavero超过 12 年前
don't like this at all, it looks like a step backwards, let the windows manager handle windows instead of doing it inside your webapp, next thing you know they are going to add a taskbar on the browser for each open pseudo-window
septerr超过 12 年前
Good. I wonder if this also addresses the problem when you are replying to a long chain of email conversation, the compose box includes the entire chain while also displaying the chain above the compose box. Very unpleasant.
6ren超过 12 年前
or you could just use the old html version of gmail, and open as many messages as you like in different tabs.<p><a href="http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=html" rel="nofollow">http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=html</a>
sethbannon超过 12 年前
It's amazing, when you ask "why would you need a whole page for composing an email?" there is no good answer. Someone dozens of years ago probably made that decision and it's just stuck.
评论 #4721515 未加载
hnriot超过 12 年前
How is this return to popups any different to the option that's always been present, shift-click to open compose in a new window. Personally, I liked having the choice.
endtime超过 12 年前
I've been using this side-by-side with the old UX on my personal account for weeks (months?). Much prefer the new UX. Glad it's finally launching.
monochromatic超过 12 年前
I like it. I cannot count the number of times I've just popped open a new gmail tab to address this exact shortcoming.
kamakazizuru超过 12 年前
awesome! this makes up quite a bit of the love they lost with their abyssmal redesign earlier this year!
EdiX超过 12 年前
Am I missing something or is there no way to pick the sender address in the new composer?
评论 #4722145 未加载
dangravell超过 12 年前
Might be good, but I can't use this until they support canned responses again.
ggopman超过 12 年前
The Sparrow team hard at work
iamrohitbanga超过 12 年前
Looks like pushing google plus to all gmail users.
iDroid超过 12 年前
Yahoo mail has half those features already
neopba超过 12 年前
I use IMAP :)
marshallp超过 12 年前
Why is this so important that it reaches top spot in minutes. My links to curing cancer with ultrasound or creating ai get nothing, but the big G opens a new window for compose and it's a giant leap for humanity!<p>Peter Norvig gave singularity summit talk on exciting work they're doing <a href="http://fora.tv/2012/10/14/Peter_Norvig_Channeling_the_Flood_of_Data" rel="nofollow">http://fora.tv/2012/10/14/Peter_Norvig_Channeling_the_Flood_...</a> , why isn't that top spot?<p>HN is kowtowing to the pseudo-brogrammer crowd.
评论 #4718123 未加载
评论 #4718100 未加载
评论 #4718093 未加载
Supreme超过 12 年前
<i>facepalm</i><p>All of the pain points that this supposedly solves have already been solved with tabs. Middle click compose and all of those problems are solved with the added bonus of having an entire screen to write your email in.<p>Google is being taken over by pointy haired managers and marketing. RIP.
评论 #4718452 未加载
评论 #4718357 未加载
drivebyacct2超过 12 年前
This is great. I've hated having to open multiple tabs to be able to reference an old email(s) and compose a new one at the same time.
mememememememe超过 12 年前
Are we stupid or something? First, why the hell are we arguing over the freakin' theme here? Seriously. This tangent discussion should be removed. If you want to complain about the stupid theme, which I also find it hard to use, start your own thread.<p>Secondly, are we stupid for using these annoying shift, control shortcuts? Google is not reinventing the wheel. Google is not used by elite computer programmers. I don't even use emacs because I am a VIM user. GMail is used by over a billion user and most of them don't even know some shortcuts or nice ways to make their tasks better.<p>I don't know all the secrets you guys are pointing out, and are you going to call me stupid? This is not reinventing wheel. It's just making the app more usable.<p>If anyone start spamming me with "you can already do this with X, Y , Z ways but it's not known by everyone...".
评论 #4721129 未加载