TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How Art.sy survived a NYTimes.com homepage launch with Heroku + MongoHQ

49 点作者 carterac超过 12 年前

6 条评论

minimax超过 12 年前
No offense to the Art.sy team, but this is just Heroku marketing copy. It lacks the detail we typically see on these sorts of high scalability "how we did it" posts. Non-trivial applications scale non-trivially, and when someone comes along claiming they have solved the scalability problem with the push of a button I am instantly skeptical.<p>I would really like to see more details about their architecture, especially about the MongoHQ integration.
评论 #4834778 未加载
jcampbell1超过 12 年前
I'd read this with a grain of salt. I remember looking at art.sy via the NYTimes link and thinking the site was terribly slow. I still find it moderately slow. I am not sure they really need mixpanel, google analytics, and kissmetrics, on every click and the api calls should take less than the 1-4 seconds I am seeing.
评论 #4834511 未加载
cjstewart88超过 12 年前
I'm just curious, how much traffic NYTime brought you guys. I'm also on Heroku and my app(<a href="http://www.tubalr.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tubalr.com</a>) "survived" several articles around the web(Mashable, TechCrunch, The Verge, The Next Web, Japan LifeHacker, and several others) within a very short timespan. My bill has never been over $25, which includes no extra workers.. just extra DB storage and an upgraded DNS plugin.<p>Just curious, thanks!
评论 #4834823 未加载
triplesec超过 12 年前
Ugh! this is just a puff from heroku. Yes, I'm sure it's a great tech, but we have no idea of whether it is accurate or not. This piece has no analysis, no comparisons, and certainly no independence or objectivity.
_lex超过 12 年前
I'd love to deploy on Heroku, but it's so dramatically more expensive than aws. For a startup, is it really worth that additional cost?
评论 #4834531 未加载
评论 #4834556 未加载
评论 #4834485 未加载
thelarry超过 12 年前
I think this article can be a little misleading. Sure, with cloud tech you can easily spool up more instances. And yes, it is great to not have to worry about configuring a load balancer (I guess). But just because adding more instances sort of fixes a problem doesn't mean it is a good thing to do. Not "having to do calculations" is a very bad attitude. You should know where the bottle necks are, and if adding instances is actually necessary or just some scotch tape. Bad architecture and coding can bite you in ways that adding hardware cannot fix.