"Should Google and Youtube be forced instead to add a link to the contents official home (where legal copies can be purchased) and thereby referring potential customers back to the aggrieved party?"<p>Would this mean that the aggrieved party would then share some revenue for sales generated by YouTube? I think this is only fair. Mark Cuban talks about this a little in this post: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/comments?id=4859">http://news.ycombinator.com/comments?id=4859</a><p>