TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Bitcoin Central Licensed as Bank

78 点作者 enmaku超过 12 年前

5 条评论

dsr_超过 12 年前
Are accounts insured in BTC or EUR? It seems to me that closing the bank (and let's face it, that does happen in the real world from time to time) could cause a run on BTC since the supply is so limited compared to traditional currencies. If all accounts are actually insured in EUR, on the other hand, BTC deposits are either not covered or are treated as equivalent to EUR via an exchange rate, which implies actual equivalence.
评论 #4886996 未加载
Petrushka超过 12 年前
Quite interesting that Bitcoin appears to be making inroads into the mainstream financial system (which being registered a bank would seem to imply). The primary issue with Bitcoin is that because it is issued by no one, and is no one's primary currency, there is no incentive or ability by any organization to regulate it through monetary policy. It's value is set only by the market. The flaws with such a system is obvious, and Bitcoin experienced it itself when it went through that massive devaluation a few years back. Even with automated banking systems, the market structures used throughout the world are based on currencies having a measure of stability to them in terms of pricing, or, at the very least, that a central bank of some sort will give ample notice before a massive change will occur. With Bitcoin, that all goes out the window, and pricing becomes a major challenge. As such, I don't see anyway Bitcoin can move into the mainstream marketplace. It has to be a niche provider. So this step is very interesting and counter-intuitive.<p>Should note, when I say no regulation, I mean it can't be regulated according to market movements. It's regulated by a pre-set system of release, not one that can react to changing circumstances.
评论 #4887562 未加载
评论 #4888515 未加载
apeace超过 12 年前
This is a huge step backwards. I don't understand why anyone wants this to be done.<p>Banks are already great for things that banks do, like insuring deposits and putting your account within reach of authorities. Presenting an ID to get a Bitcoin account which is regulated by central authorities, both private and government, seems antithetical to the purpose of Bitcoin.<p>This isn't to say one organization going mainstream PSP will hurt Bitcoin. I simply don't see the point, that's all.<p>The rest of us will continue using Bitcoin through Tor and i2p, keeping our money safe and anonymous.
评论 #4888543 未加载
评论 #4888673 未加载
minato超过 12 年前
What kind of bank make a test on an FAQ page ?! <a href="https://bitcoin-central.net/s/faq" rel="nofollow">https://bitcoin-central.net/s/faq</a>
xntrk超过 12 年前
Bitcoin Central to be hacked in 3...2...1.....