TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Oxygen-Powered Jet Travels The World In 4 Hours

6 点作者 yottoy超过 12 年前

6 条评论

chrisbennet超过 12 年前
The article title is misleading. An oxygen powered jet <i>did not</i> travel the world in 4 hours. An oxygen powered jet did not travel at all. An oxygen powered jet does not exist.<p>But someday, using this new engine technology, it might be possible.
评论 #4917390 未加载
sgentle超过 12 年前
Oxygen-Powered Jet Might Someday Travel The World In 4 Hours If Technology Proves Viable And Meets Actual Market Demand At Acceptable Cost<p>Near as I can tell, the article is mixing up two different things. SABRE is being tested as a rocket engine - it recently got some press on here because they had a successful heat exchanger test which, while pretty cool, does not an engine make. As I understand it since that test the ESA has given the nod to SABRE and believes there isn't any technical reason why the engine won't work.<p>The article mentions that the main advantage will be that "aircrafts can carry less load in terms of on-board liquid oxygen". This is presumably actually referring to rockets, not aircraft, since conventional jet aircraft already use regular old air. "massive throw-away first stages", again, hopefully refers to rockets, otherwise there might be some expensive property damage when your passenger jet drops its first stage on La Guardia.<p>There is an actual passenger jet piece, though. A separate initiative called the A2, a hypersonic passenger jet based on a derivative of SABRE. If built, it could apparently travel at Mach 5 and take you halfway around the world in something like 4.6 hours, which is pretty close to 4 if you squint.<p>All of this stuff is being planned by the same company, and Wikipedia says the plane's coming within 25 years "if there is market demand" - so although this all sounds good, and it's nice they've had a successful test, I think it's safe for now to treat this new oxygen-powered jet as vapourware.<p>(sorry)
typpo超过 12 年前
The wikipedia article[1] is about 100 times as informative as this article. Apparently the technology was conceived of in the 50s, and it looks like basic hardware testing took place earlier this year.<p>I have no aerospace background but this reminds me of ramjets, which have been flying since the 40s but aren't used to transport people.<p>[1] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SABRE_(rocket_engine)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SABRE_(rocket_engine)</a>
aspratley超过 12 年前
This has a far better explanation of what the engine is about: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20510112" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20510112</a><p>There's also a documentary on the developers: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZ_a21fPkYM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZ_a21fPkYM</a>
stcredzero超过 12 年前
How is the SABRE engine any more oxygen powered than any other jet engine in air breathing mode?
评论 #4917259 未加载
oboizt超过 12 年前
If the load is lighter because the aircraft doesn't need to carry liquid oxygen, then does that mean it requires less fuel?<p>Or does oxygen-powered mean it requires no fuel?<p>I'm a bit confused by the brevity of the article...