TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Autofocus time management system

6 点作者 tjpick超过 12 年前

2 条评论

meej超过 12 年前
Mark Forster's time management systems are interesting. Did you see Autofocus version 4? Of all the ones I've tried, it's the one I like best, though his "Final Version" system has been growing on me the more I try it.<p><a href="http://markforster.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/5/preliminary-instructions-for-autofocus-v-4.html" rel="nofollow">http://markforster.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/5/preliminary...</a><p>There's also a nice "animation" of AF4 in action: <a href="http://autofocus.cc/public/data/af4-demo.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://autofocus.cc/public/data/af4-demo.pdf</a>
lopatin超过 12 年前
Can someone explain why something like this is better than a simple to-do list/app? I'm a fan of GTD apps because they're a place I can structure my thoughts of what's next, and see some performance metrics to remind me when I'm slacking.<p>However, this system seems like overkill to me. In the end, no matter what kind of system you place your "Write end-to-end tests" to-do in, you're going to have to sit down, forget about your time management system, and focus completely on writing these the specs. Reading through his blog posts about Autofocus, I get the feeling that he's sending the message that if you use this system, the actual task of writing your end-to-end tests will be easier. But it seems to me that you will just be wasting precious time maintaining this time management system, and will have less time to do whatever it is you actually need to achieve.<p>This is all coming from a person who hasn't tried it. Does anyone have experience with this? Do all the complicated rules actually improve your productivity?