Time Magazine Flipboard style web version (chrome/safari only)

We seem intent on enabling an old-style media format that is dying in the background, rightly so. I don't read content online because I don't like flipping pages, I read it online because I don't like sorting through crap. Flipboard is pretty and quiet elegant, so I don't really relish the idea of criticizing it...but the fact of the matter is – it's not a better way to read.

Looks like they just took this demo and added more content<p><a href="http://tympanus.net/Development/FlipboardPageLayout/" rel="nofollow">http://tympanus.net/Development/FlipboardPageLayout/</a>

well, this one is far more impressive<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/skimmer" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/skimmer</a>

Time Mag has ads on their site. As in, they're trying to make money. I'm not sure it's a great idea for you to take all their content, put it on another website, use their logo/branding, and then tell the world you did it. I would recommend not doing that at all.

The public beta version of NOOWIT is gonna be released by the end of this month..It's the future of magazines :) <a href="http://www.noowit.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.noowit.com/</a>

@tzury you shouldn't compare the two. this one was designed by a third party (in this case using betterinternet tool), which is cool

Created using <a href="http://betterinternet.co" rel="nofollow">http://betterinternet.co</a>

Created using "BetterInternet," but webkit-only websites do not a better Internet make.

For me, a lot of the headlines read, "The Most Expensive Tuna Ever Sold." Weird...

maybe! but it's irrelevant. The top version wasn't created by TIME Magazine like the skimmer version.

Too bad it's WebKit browser specific.

Another site that blindly blocks a browser based on user agent. Is checking for capabilities that hard?