Per the article, the school's motivation in adding an RFID tracker was to have more accurate reporting on daily attendance (leading to more federal funding). However, in an attempt to accommodate the student, the school district offered her the choice of wearing a non-RFID badge. I wonder how the school was going to detect her presence without the tag. If they were able to, then they shouldn't do RFID for _anyone_. If they are NOT able to(which I would think is likely), then why ask her to wear the plain badge without RFID? They should have just offered her an exception to make the the whole case go away!