TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Worst-Run Big City in the U.S. – San Francisco (2009)

148 点作者 anemitz超过 12 年前

13 条评论

rayiner超过 12 年前
San Francisco's budget last year was $6.8 billion. Chicago's was $6.3 billion San Francisco has 800,000 people. Chicago has 2,700,000 people.<p>Oh, and this is a map of the Muni: <a href="http://0.tqn.com/d/sanfrancisco/1/0/U/N/-/-/sanfranciscomunimap800.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://0.tqn.com/d/sanfrancisco/1/0/U/N/-/-/sanfranciscomuni...</a><p>This is a map of the CTA elevated line: <a href="http://www.transitchicago.com/assets/1/maps/ctatrainmap.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.transitchicago.com/assets/1/maps/ctatrainmap.png</a><p>This is a map of Caltrain: <a href="http://www.caltrain.com/Assets/maps/Caltrain+Zone+Map.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.caltrain.com/Assets/maps/Caltrain+Zone+Map.jpg</a><p>This is a map of Metra: <a href="http://www.mrl.ucsb.edu/~yopopov/rrt/us/chicago/rr_chicago_metra.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.mrl.ucsb.edu/~yopopov/rrt/us/chicago/rr_chicago_m...</a><p>I found this quote interesting: "For all its scotch-soaked flaws, the city of yore did not suffer from these problems. While archaic and stridently antidemocratic by today's standards, the system of government cobbled together by a citizens' commission in 1931 largely did what our forebears wanted it to do — mind the store and eliminate rampant corruption."<p>I think municipal governments should be run by benevolent dictators. If you leave everything up to the market, you get disasters like Northern Virginia. If you go to the ballot for everything, you end up with disasters like San Francisco. No, benevolent dictators are the way to go. I'm a huge fan of Guilliani and Bloomberg's work in NYC. Love them or hate them, you'd rather live in NYC circa 2013 than NYC circa 1993. I have high hopes for Rahm Emmanuel in Chicago. He apparently came up with his last budget using a process for soliciting input from others in the government that boiled down to "fuck you!"
评论 #5114558 未加载
评论 #5115085 未加载
评论 #5114643 未加载
评论 #5114466 未加载
评论 #5114497 未加载
评论 #5115277 未加载
评论 #5114791 未加载
评论 #5115651 未加载
评论 #5115975 未加载
评论 #5115360 未加载
评论 #5115363 未加载
评论 #5114708 未加载
Cushman超过 12 年前
&#62; You can't get San Francisco running efficiently, because that would require large numbers of unionized city workers to willingly admit their redundancy and wastefulness. Inefficiency pays their salaries.<p>I predict we will all have this problem before too long. Every time you hear a politician talk about "creating jobs", this is what they are talking about: work as welfare. Gotta right to live, gotta work to live, so you gotta right to work-- never mind if, by working, you're actually damaging the economy.<p>Right now it's only a few obsolete unions and they sound crazy, but the robots will come for all of us eventually. We need to start working yesterday on a society that can conceive of supporting even those who contribute nothing, or I fear that the era of free food will see us all starve to death.
评论 #5114713 未加载
ajays超过 12 年前
MUNI is just one of the problems with SF. There are many more.<p>Firstly: this is a city of transplants. You'd be hard-pressed to find a native SF'an in your daily interactions. (I know just a couple, and I've been here 6 years). As a result, many of them don't vote; or if they do, they don't have the context to see through the bullshit that is put out there. They'll take a politician's word, when a long-term resident will remember that that fucker has been lying for 20 years. As a corollary to this, you can control the City if you can put together a decent-sized voting block. So, for example: the City has 25,000 employees. If you can get the City employees on your side, then their votes alone are enough to swing most elections in your favor. For example: many years ago, the MUNI drivers got the City Charter amended to guarantee that they would be at least the second-highest paid drivers in the nation! Can you even imagine the clout they had to modify a city's constitution? (Thankfully, this was repealed a couple of years ago).<p>Secondly: the City has a lot of money to spend. The people in power stay in power via a huge game of doing (and getting) favors. For example: the City spends over $500 million/year on various "non profits". Your non-profit won't get a dollar unless you employ "consultants" who will help you write the proposal; and these consultants are very well-connected people. And they get a ton of money for a few days work (it's not uncommon to see such consultants be on payroll making $300K at a non-profit, but noone ever sees them at work).<p>Thirdly: the City is exceedingly corrupt. If you know the right people, you can get away with anything. This is why you have leeches like (Slick) Willie Brown and Rose Pak running the show. They know how the system works, and make a living just by greasing the wheels and pulling strings.<p>This is why, during elections, I vote for the people who are the most removed from the corridors of power. Anyone who has had anything to do with the System doesn't get my vote. It may be like throwing the baby out with the bathwater, but the City needs an enema.
评论 #5116578 未加载
评论 #5116414 未加载
dmckeon超过 12 年前
The url for all 6 pages of the article in one is: <a href="http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-12-16/news/the-worst-run-big-city-in-the-u-s/full/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-12-16/news/the-worst-run-big-ci...</a>
评论 #5116057 未加载
nestlequ1k超过 12 年前
Worst run transportation system in the country. But on the good side, it's what has enabled Uber and Sidecar to thrive.<p>In SF, even the disfunction is startup friendly.
评论 #5114539 未加载
spc476超过 12 年前
I find it hard to believe that any city could be run worse than Detroit.
评论 #5115679 未加载
评论 #5114602 未加载
评论 #5116159 未加载
评论 #5115047 未加载
评论 #5114589 未加载
pbreit超过 12 年前
From 2009 but a good read and I'm sure as valid as ever.
tyang超过 12 年前
Why is this 2009 article trending now?<p>People want to live in San Francisco in spite of the city government, just like the summers there.
beatpanda超过 12 年前
We actually do this on purpose. It's a hazing ritual. And it's how we keep the city weird. You are free to leave!
评论 #5115370 未加载
评论 #5115368 未加载
hisabness超过 12 年前
yes, blame the city's problems on the head of the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department. is this supposed to be journalism?
ahoyhere超过 12 年前
Philadelphia is so much worse. Bigger, poorer, more corrupt. There is good reason to believe that the political "ruling families" trade off power, and pay each other not to run.<p>Here's an example: City infrastructure like sewer pipes and water mains are owned by a private company, who doesn't appear to ever do maintenance. And when the 100+-year-old pipes inevitably break, causing sinkholes in major roads, the city pays the company to "fix" them. Which is why a major intersection 3 blocks from my house, in one of the busiest &#38; most touristy parts of the city, has been closed for 4 months aaaand counting.<p>Also… Public transit? Ha!<p>School funding? HA! There's an epic budget shortfall for education but city hall is spending something like $40-50 million to build a park in front of city hall: <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/Bids-due-for-50M-rebuild-on-City-Hall-park.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/Bids-due-...</a><p>Comcast and other major corporations pay zero taxes.<p>Still a better place to live than SF though, if you ask me, but I avoid all talk about politics like the plague, and I take taxis and donate a car payment's worth to local DonorsChoose projects every month.
评论 #5116833 未加载
spitx超过 12 年前
Richly pertinent here is a recent post on the Muni by Bryan Goldberg.<p>"As I’ve written before, and will write more about in the future, California and San Francisco suffer from “The Italian Complex”.<p>Our state is a lot like the nation of Italy. It has a beautiful natural landscape and weather that most people would envy. It is geographically diverse — we enjoy great sunshine and great skiing in relatively close proximity. The people are culturally pleasant, love life, and you can strike up conversation with gentle strangers. We are intellectual and passionate about both arts and science. They gave us the Renaissance, and we gave the world the Digital Age. But for all the natural and cultural brilliance, we are held down by an incompetent and pathetic government.<p>And if the city of San Francisco is at the heart of our political incompetence, then the Muni system is like the left and right ventricle.<p>The problems with Muni are so tremendous and infuriating that I don’t even know where to begin. But here are a few points off the top of my head (with a little help from Google).<p>Muni generates a mind-bogglingly small proportion of its own funding…<p>Muni charges people fares to ride, and you would think that these fares could cover at least a meaningful portion of their immense operating costs. But no. They cover a measly $198 million of the $821 million budget. That’s not even one quarter of the cost. The biggest contributor to Muni’s budget is parking tickets and fines, which should surprise nobody. But this is really just an accounting gimmick to charge taxpayers for Muni, because in most cities parking tickets would be used to fund an array of services.<p>Nobody is saying that Muni should operate at profit. Or that it should come even close to profit. But how about covering half of its costs through revenue from its users?<p>In comparison, the NYC MTA generates over $7 billion from fares and tolls, which covers more than half of its $13.4 billion annual budget.<p>The Chinatown political machine ensures that they get the lion’s share of the benefits<p>The epicenter of Muni is on Stockton, Powell, and the other major arteries that run through Chinatown. By ‘coincidence,’ this is also where the new super-expensive subway will run. People who ride the bus know about the “Dirty 30” and “45” lines that needlessly take Marina and Pac Heights commuters through the congestion of Chinatown en route to their jobs downtown or in Soma.<p>This is not because such routes and investments serve the people of San Francisco. It is because the Chinatown political machine controlled by Rose Pak — who basically put our mayor into office — decrees it to be the case.<p>The political machine keeps rolling. The big infrastructure money goes to Chinatown. Naïve hipsters with high salaries have no idea it’s going on. And the virtuous cycle continues.<p>But I’m sure that the camera shops, trinket stands, and street-side produce markets of Chinatown are the ones providing the city with most of its tax, jobs, and commerce income.<p>Muni is basically useless, anyhow. Walking is better.<p>Taking Muni is basically a waste of effort and money. You will be stunned by how little time you save by riding the bus vs. just walking. Riding a bike is so much more effective than taking the bus that it’s laughable.<p>This is a tiny city, and you can walk from any one point to another in 45 minutes most of the time.<p>But, back to walking. Anyone who is traveling in a North-South direction to commute (i.e. Marina to Downtown) knows that by the time the 30 or 45 bus gets to Chinatown, you can get out and walk faster, plus you don’t feel like a sardine. That walk is a no-brainer.<p>But what about East-West commuters (i.e. Lower Haight to Downtown)? To illustrate, I will use my old commute and Google Maps. I used to live at Fillmore/Hayes, which was two full miles from my office at Kearny/Sutter. By San Francisco standards, this is a fairly typical distance from work. According to Google Maps, the walk will take 34 minutes. If you take the N-Judah, the absolute fastest you can do the ride is in 20 minutes, but that assumes no wait for the bus, which is unlikely. Throw in a reasonable wait for the bus, and now you save maybe five minutes door-to-door. Plus it costs money and you get way less exercise. And you may get sick from having twenty people within two feet of you. So there’s that cost too.<p>In short, Muni is basically useless."<p>I agree in full.<p>Source: <a href="http://pandodaily.com/2012/12/29/muni-is-100-years-old-too-bad-it-wont-die-like-a-human-that-age/" rel="nofollow">http://pandodaily.com/2012/12/29/muni-is-100-years-old-too-b...</a>
评论 #5116152 未加载
评论 #5117232 未加载
L0j1k超过 12 年前
This person has clearly never been to Honolulu, as our system load and human capacity problems are evident even to tourists on a weekend-long stay. And yes, folks, it's directly the fault of the city and county of Honolulu for not creating infrastructure to accommodate the growth. It's a very backwards political system; one that dreams of a long-gone Honolulu from the 1940s. This island is pushing a million people, and our systems simply cannot withstand the amount of friction being applied to them. The whole system breaks down continually.