Anonymous needs to get a better understanding of the effects of their actions. I'm all for taking illegal but morally acceptable actions on a calculated and reasonable basis. Using vigilante website-takeovers as a way to call for a more fair justice system is not reasonable. A pseudo-criminal, intellectually unsophisticated hacking collective's endorsement does not do justice to the reality that Aaron was hounded despite lacking any substantial wrongdoing, as acknowledged by JSTOR's lawyers.