TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Unintelligent Design

19 点作者 gdee大约 16 年前

5 条评论

biohacker42大约 16 年前
One of the things about life is that it lack the discreet boundaries of math.<p>There is no clear, sharp, crisp line in the sand between life and not life.<p>And it turns out the line between virii and bacteria is kind of messy too.<p>In fact that's not surprising, what would be surprising is finding a sharp and clear difference, now that would be unusual.<p>And another minor point, we know of divergent evolution for things as complex as large animals, like echidnas and hedgehogs. And that article talks about all virii sharing the proteins to make their capsule, and implies they all inherited it from a common ancestor. But isn't that an extraordinary claim? Isn't it just as likely for there to have been multiple origins and we're just looking at convergent evolution? For things that simple, how many ways to build a capsid could there be?
评论 #515046 未加载
gdee大约 16 年前
Old (2006) article but extremely intellectually gratifying. A leaf of a wikitrip of course.
lssndrdn大约 16 年前
In a way, it's not all that surprising that virus might have been around for longer than other living forms, being simpler and with less moving parts. It's the KISS principle of life, I guess.
TweedHeads大约 16 年前
An intelligent designer would have given us arms AND wings, and a green skin to let us feed from photosynthesis and the sun. The human race wouldn't be more than a couple of feet tall.<p>Now THAT is intelligent design. But as we know, designers work in mysterious ways...
Allocator2008大约 16 年前
Great article. For my money viruses are indeed "living" since what we call life is just that which carries and replicates RNA, or, the "selfish gene".
评论 #515151 未加载