TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

US Attorney Carmen Ortiz could end up with big legal bill from motel case

78 点作者 i4i超过 12 年前

10 条评论

hexonexxon超过 12 年前
Same psycho freedom stealing prosecutor also had to grovel to the courts a few days ago that her office arrested the wrong guy in a high profile gang case because he kind of looked like who they were after. Innocent guy enjoyed almost a month in prison and legal bills<p><a href="http://reason.com/24-7/2013/01/30/carmen-ortiz-blew-a-gang-arrest-by-nabbi" rel="nofollow">http://reason.com/24-7/2013/01/30/carmen-ortiz-blew-a-gang-a...</a>
AJ007超过 12 年前
I thought that case sounded familiar, the WSJ had a very good article back in 2011 on it and asset forfeiture: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204450804576623404141904000.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020445080457662...</a><p>This story is more than one about a rogue prosecutor, "the government is overstepping its bounds in a practice that has swelled in the past decade to encompass some 400 federal statutes, covering crimes from drug trafficking to racketeering to halibut poaching."<p>If you don't read the article, take a look at this infographic: <a href="http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/P1-BD015_FORFEI_G_20111017183008.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/P1-BD015_FORFEI_G_...</a><p>In NY and CO, asset forfeitures have increased 1,000% since 2003. Think there might be a problem here?
评论 #5154849 未加载
hannibalhorn超过 12 年前
I wouldn't have any problem with the government going after what is basically a drug den, but the article says "Law enforcement officials cited 15 incidents over a similar number of years"... That's one incident a year.<p>If I owned ANY hotel, particularly in a bad part of town, I'd be rather proud that the police only came out to visit once a year. That's simply a business where some things are out of your control.
gamblor956超过 12 年前
The U.S. Attorney's <i>office</i> could end up with a million dollar legal bill, but this would not affect Carmen Ortiz's finances.
评论 #5154587 未加载
评论 #5154562 未加载
评论 #5156057 未加载
mcherm超过 12 年前
So the lesson here is that if a federal prosecutor wants to take something, like your house or a $1,000,000 hotel you own free-and-clear, then even if their case is SO weak that they will go on to lose on nearly every point, it will still take you about $500,000 of legal bills to defend yourself, and that's BEFORE the appeals, plus some of his lawyers were free.
philwelch超过 12 年前
So I have an interesting proposal. Carmen Ortiz is the US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. We get all kinds of stories about her along this vein, but really she's the only US Attorney we're giving this much scrutiny for. I propose we randomly select three other US Attorneys and subject them to the same scrutiny, illustrating whether it's just that Carmen Ortiz is an awful human being, or whether it's the entire system that's broken.
评论 #5157785 未加载
评论 #5155837 未加载
gesman超过 12 年前
Don't worry, taxpayers will take care of the tab.
linuxhansl超过 12 年前
Not if I should laugh or cry.<p>It's nice that government overreach is (potentially) punished. On the other hand it's an embarrassment for the entire legal system that defending against such overreach costs upwards of $500k.
el_cuadrado超过 12 年前
I though this was a pretty much standard legal procedure in this circumstances. How is that news?
评论 #5155007 未加载
评论 #5157831 未加载
i4i超过 12 年前
Institute for Justice (who represented the Motel Caswell) posted a wrap-up of the case. <a href="http://www.ij.org/massachusetts-civil-forfeiture-release-1-24-2013" rel="nofollow">http://www.ij.org/massachusetts-civil-forfeiture-release-1-2...</a>