I'm so affended by this article's lack of facts and evidence, the speculation, and the lack of understanding about the scientific community and its process.
The author also seems to forget that special relativity was published years after he read this, and then it would still be years more before he would publish general relativity which was a completely new work of science.<p>Science is first published first served. If your theory is flawed it is almost certainly null and void; a perfect opportunity for another scientist to take the work and run with it.<p>Furthermore, this is not Apple, which you can bad mouth and expect everyone to be interested and want to pile on. This is almost unequivocal he was the brittiest man to live who also wrote the most eloquent succinct equation which would completely change our understanding of energy, space, time and the universe forever more.