TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why Real Businesses Don't Charge $5/month

39 点作者 justinmares超过 12 年前

10 条评论

ebiester超过 12 年前
It <i>all</i> depends on your service. I am willing to pay $20 a year for cross-device password management for personal use, not $20 a month. I am willing to pay $$$ for a CRM. For businesses, your product must save me more money than if I do it myself. If it's a mere convenience that can be duplicated by an excel spreadsheet, I'm only willing to spend so much.<p>I suggest looking at what your value proposition is: if you think you can provide $50,000 dollars of value to your customer, you shouldn't be charging $5 a month. If your plan provides only a small amount of value, you better hope it provides that value to a large number of people. :) But you're not going to get away with charging more.
halcyondaze超过 12 年前
While this is definitely a thought experiment, we found the basic premise to be true when we redesigned our product, pricing plans, and free trial strategy.<p>We went from:<p>Free Forever / $29 / $59 / $149<p>7 Day Trial / $49 / $149 / $249<p>And we have an overall better customer base (they find more value in our app) and relatively the same signup metrics as we had before.
mjn超过 12 年前
Sure, if your market lets you charge more, go ahead and charge more. But in some markets, real businesses charge $5/mo, because market conditions don't let them charge $10/mo (or at least don't allow them to meet their other goals at that price). Evernote Premium is $5/mo, Google Drive charges $4.99/mo for 100GB of space, etc. Heck, Fastmail charges $1.65/mo for its "Full" plan (billed as $20/yr), or $3.33 for its "Enhanced".
评论 #5209359 未加载
评论 #5209237 未加载
ceejayoz超过 12 年前
Unless I'm missing a paragraph, this pretends charging 3x as much won't ever reduce the number of people who sign up?
评论 #5209400 未加载
评论 #5209220 未加载
评论 #5209217 未加载
jimzvz超过 12 年前
Surely the whole point of lowering prices is to reduce cost of acquisition as well as churn. Where is this in your example?
评论 #5209158 未加载
brownbat超过 12 年前
Beware, you Ingvar Kamprads, Karl Albrechts, and Sam Waltons: only poverty awaits.
评论 #5211503 未加载
kevinthew超过 12 年前
this might be the dumbest blog post I've seen posted on HN. why is anyone reading crappy marketing blogs that have no basic understanding of accounting or microeconomics?
venomsnake超过 12 年前
Poor backblaze ... they are doomed. Call them and tell them they are not real business.
评论 #5209145 未加载
keesj超过 12 年前
Is this article about WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS to run, or HOW TO PRICE IT? I think it's mixing some logic of the two.
o0-0o超过 12 年前
google charges $5/yr for their basic data plan.
评论 #5209160 未加载