TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Weapons made with 3-D printers could test gun-control efforts

33 点作者 jamessun超过 12 年前

14 条评论

DanielBMarkham超过 12 年前
We've had a problem over the last decade or so: how do governments deal with populations where the individuals have more and more power?<p>America has traditionally been more libertarian than most countries, so the crisis isn't as bad here, but we still see the signs. We're outlawing doing certain kinds of reverse engineering, we're making copyright violations a criminal offense, and so forth. (Most of our government reaction has been in the form of protecting large industries).<p>Some other countries are seeing crackdowns on where you can go on the internet, who you can talk to. To those countries, individuals simply having the power to gather information is too much for them.<p>I hate to make cataclysmic predictions, but I think the U.S. is going to get pulled more and more into your house and head. Where you surf, what you consume, what kinds of things you print on your 3-D printers. 3-D printing is the thing that is going to change everything, because now we can <i>make</i> whatever we need without having to rely on established patterns of commerce (which the government can control).<p>If it helps any, I don't think this is some sort of deliberate power grab. Quite frankly I don't think the people we have running things are anywhere near qualified enough to be making the decisions they are, On top of that, we have no examples throughout history of a government with the ability to control and monitor so much of each person's life. There's no precedent.<p>3-D printing, to me, is the one tech that over the next 50 years or so will dramatically change everything. Robots are a close second. Fun times to be alive! (Or perhaps a more accurate word than "fun" would be "interesting")
评论 #5244254 未加载
评论 #5244446 未加载
评论 #5244661 未加载
knowaveragejoe超过 12 年前
More sensationalism about 3D printed guns. People, please - nobody is going to be printing a functioning gun purely out of ABS plastic on a &#60;$1k hobby printer for a long time(if ever).<p>The only people who might be printing guns(requiring pretty rigorous touchup after the printing process) are those with access with extremely expensive printers that can print metal.<p>I sincerely hope this doesn't lead to regulating 3d printing into oblivion. Just like the entertainment industry wishes it got the jump on filesharing, I'm sure big manufacturing is prepping its lobbying efforts.
评论 #5244527 未加载
评论 #5244690 未加载
winestock超过 12 年前
It's almost a year old, but Scott Locklin's comments are still pertinent, especially since it discusses the AR-15 which the Washington Post article discusses.<p><a href="https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2012/08/11/bad-engineering-journalism-reporting-on-3-d-printing-of-guns/" rel="nofollow">https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2012/08/11/bad-engineerin...</a>
评论 #5244238 未加载
jstanley超过 12 年前
Why is 3D printing a gun any different to making one with machining tools? Surely the same laws should apply, and this is just an advancement of home-manufacturing technology that has no real involvement with gun laws.
评论 #5244243 未加载
评论 #5244183 未加载
AnthonyMouse超过 12 年前
&#62;He suggests one way to prevent dangerous, illegal usage of 3-D printers is to better control gunpowder, an idea that has come up in gun control in the past.<p>Isn't gunpowder pretty easy to manufacture too? Not with a 3D printer, obviously, but with common materials and a cursory knowledge of chemistry.<p>&#62;When I tell them the law that would stop these plastic guns from getting onto planes is expiring in just a few months, people are appalled.<p>This is the essence of missing the point. The issue with 3D printed weapons is that you <i>can't</i> ban them. I have to imagine that it's already illegal to bring a gun onto a plane, so he has to be talking about banning their manufacture, which is the exact thing 3D printing will make moot.<p>Can we please at some point graduate from trying to prohibit anything with a sharp edge and instead try to address crime and terrorism at the root? I realize that isn't as profitable with campaign contributors or as rhetorically effective in frightening the voters, but the point of a representative rather than direct democracy is that legislators are supposed to make hard or unpopular decisions when it's necessary.
评论 #5244780 未加载
评论 #5244674 未加载
jamessun超过 12 年前
There are just so many interesting angles to this story. I'll start with just one...<p>The government is always behind the curve when it comes to regulating technology. The rise of text messaging has forced local and state governments to create new laws to discourage/punish distracted driving. Airbnb and Uber have disrupted the traditional hotel and taxicab industries respectively, and have caused lawmakers to rethink how best to regulate those industries.<p>3-D printing is on the verge of becoming a mainstream technology and we'll continue to see more issues like the one highlighted in this story.<p>The Second Amendment to the US Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Does it also allow us to print our own weapons? Does the First Amendment to the US Constitution protect websites that provide instructions and blueprints on how to print your own weapons (or parts of weapons)?
评论 #5244205 未加载
评论 #5244244 未加载
andmarios超过 12 年前
I guess in the 90's someone could have written an article by the title «Digital copies made with computers could test copyright control efforts».
pegas123超过 12 年前
3d printing guns might be bad news for opressive regimes. I grew up under one, remember all the measures to regulate the use of xerox copy machines. A book was an enemy of the regime. Imagine guns instead. Now, where to get enough amunition?
drofmij超过 12 年前
You don't need 3-D printers to make guns. They can be quite easily made in any machine shop - albeit with varying degrees of success.<p>Zipguns / improvised firearms have been a thing for a long time -&#62; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Improvised_firearm" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Improvised_firearm</a><p>Gunpowder is pretty easy to make as well.<p>Stop whining about 3-D printers it's not that big of a deal in regards to guns.
makomk超过 12 年前
They're probably not going to test gun control as much as the press thinks. Calibrating cheap 3D printers is hard, and chances are it's going to take quite a bit of tweaking to print off a reliable magazine or other part on a new printer. I can easily see would-be spree killers getting stopped mid-massacre because their misprinted magazine jammed.
评论 #5244687 未加载
评论 #5244680 未加载
teyc超过 12 年前
Gun control or the lack of it in the U.S. is ultimately due to regulatory capture by the gun industry. I'm sure legislators will draft into laws provisions that would make sure the legal gun industry retains its commercial upsides over 3D printing.
评论 #5244190 未加载
评论 #5244146 未加载
评论 #5244551 未加载
评论 #5244118 未加载
vaadu超过 12 年前
Can we stop calling the process 3D printing?<p>print·ing /ˈprintiNG/ Noun<p>1. The production of books, newspapers, or other printed material.<p>2. A single impression of a book.<p>Synonyms print - press - impression - typography
评论 #5244643 未加载
评论 #5244658 未加载
damoncali超过 12 年前
Link to the mentioned site, Defense Distributed: <a href="http://defensedistributed.com/" rel="nofollow">http://defensedistributed.com/</a>
ck2超过 12 年前
Drunks often don't obey anti-drunk driving laws.<p>But we still have those laws for darn good reasons.<p>There is nothing wrong with having gun control laws.
评论 #5244713 未加载
评论 #5244715 未加载