Revenge porn site founder loses $250k defamation suit

Not what I assumed:<p>&#62;This particular defamation case was not related to Moore's revenge porn activities<p>I'm more curious how the cases involving his revenge porn sites will go.

Is this "revenge porn" for real or is this another case of the media taking porn industry kayfabe at face value? Between 2257 record-keeping laws and various state anti-peeping-tom laws doing a profitable revenge porn site for real seems a lot harder and riskier than just faking it.

What exactly is revenge porn and how does "defamation" apply in this case (I am aware that the suit does not involve defamation in a way related to revenge porn)? If it involves posting pornographic pictures involving others that approved of the pictures in the first place, how could that activity constitute defamation?

I hope people will come to the right conclusion about the whole Hunter Moore incident : once a potentially harmful information leaves your control there is no good way to stop it from reaching people you don't want it to. Sexting is probably not a good idea, at least until our society normalizes to the age of free-flowing information.

Seriously how the fuck can we earn money that way and still be considered as an honest citizen ???

What is a "revenge porn" site? At work don't want to Google this....

This is great news. Scumbags like him will have to think twice now.

I'm usually not for vendetta, but with that punk i would not mind. Is this thing legal really ? or is it because the victim are not big corporations that can bribe lawmakers to make it illegal ?

is this good or bad?

this is the reason i detest facebook. People post pictures of others which links to their profiles. It is very similar to what this person is doing. Fb wouldn't falsely accuse people though.