TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Managerial Blunders - From The Economist

5 点作者 mathewgj大约 16 年前

3 条评论

jeremytliles大约 16 年前
Interesting. In my experience, company leaders typically engineer discussions in order to validate what they already believe, and of course it can be a career-limiter to argue too forcefully with one's superior. I think it takes an executive with extraordinary vision to actually create a culture where dissension is encouraged and people with differing views truly engage and are fairly listened to.<p>I believe I've read somewhere that some high percentage of business leaders are classified as optimists, which probably creates a tendency to downplay the negatives of business situations. In an overall sense, this may be a good thing, as it leads people to attempt things that seem crazy to others, but it can obviously also lead to excessive risk-taking and sundry disasters.
biohacker42大约 16 年前
Juror #8 couldn't be fired by the other jurors.<p>If that had been a business he almost certainly would have been gone.<p>Which is why the only way business advances is through creative destruction.<p>And I've always thought that creative destruction implies that <i>most</i> enterprises go bust.<p>Thus having anything too big to fail should not be allowed. Failure is essential.
mpk大约 16 年前
Designating one or more devil's advocates is a good strategy. That way the naysayer isn't perceived as a negative person.<p>Of course, the company culture also goes a long way in facilitating this.