Alleged Google Nexus 5 Image Leaked Online

Worthless link-bait. Is this "leak" in any way believable? Come on, the source is an "anonymous source claiming to work for Google"? No reputable publication would publish something based on that. And the specs are just totally random. (A TV tuner in a Google device? How does that make any sense? LG switching to OLEDs on phones?).

Can you buy an N4 simply yet? :-) I hope that they have sorted out the supply chain and web store before launching a new device.<p>The specs on that thing look insane for a $300 price point; a handheld device now has more power than a laptop for double the price 4 years previously. I wonder how that power and screen can translate to battery life...<p>I'd also love to see a waterproof Nexus. As far as I know, only Sony makes a waterproof high-end phone. I have an Experia Go after my GN died in a rainstorm...I'd love to have another Nexus device, but I'd want one that could live in my pockets during an unexpected downpour.

&#62; The LG Nexus 5 device features a _5.2_-inch OLED display at 1080p resolution.<p>I hope that's a typo.

If that's internal marketing material, I love that they choose to show a presumed gang member pointing a gun.<p>I'm really surprised nobody's pointed out how male-targeted the big Android players are. Verizon with their red everything Droid robots and aggressive marketing language.<p>Android stuff feels more high-RPM than high-fashion.

What's the deal with headlines these days that any information about even not so popular products that no one cares about are also called 'leaked'? As if all companies care so much about secrecy and as if the whole world is waiting with bated breath just to have a glance of these images?

<p><pre><code> The rear camera of the LG Nexus 5 is supposedly a 16MP OmniVision capable of recording 4K video at 30 frames- per-second, or 1080p video at 60FPS </code></pre> Well isn't that impressive. This reminds of videos comparing iPhone4S's camera with top-of-the-line cameras like the Canon 5d Mark ii: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIaa8IM-Auo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIaa8IM-Auo</a><p>My question is: why aren't these uber-powerful camera phones driving down the costs of high-end dedicated cameras, when they are in fact in some cases competing with them head-to-head?