TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

When writing blog post titles, forget about SEO

19 点作者 stritar大约 12 年前

5 条评论

halo18大约 12 年前
"Search engine rankings are influenced mostly by (social media) backlinks."<p>Hilarious.<p>Also - cramming a keyword you want into a title tag that doesn't fit the content is shitty SEO. There's a difference between that, and doing it well.
评论 #5473209 未加载
评论 #5472730 未加载
评论 #5472882 未加载
petecampbell大约 12 年前
I'm sorry but you have a few details wrong in this post.<p>If you're concerned about referencing keywords, you could do it in body copy as opposed to the post title.<p>Also, rankings are largely influenced by the number of sites linking to a post, alongside on-page keyword references, well-built sites and user experience. Social signals are just a catalyst - not a direct factor.
评论 #5472695 未加载
salvadors大约 12 年前
&#62;&#62; <i>it's every blogger's dream his / her work will once be self-sustainable. Traffic without active (social media) involvement. I do the writing, Google does its magic, the readers to the rest.</i><p>Weird writing/typos aside, I find this concept confusing. What does it mean for writing to be self-sustainable?
TomAnthony大约 12 年前
Site struggling. Cached version:<p><a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:stritar.net%2FPost%2FNote-to-self-when-writing-blog-post-titles-forget-about-SEO.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:stritar...</a>
danso大约 12 年前
&#62;&#62; <i>" But I've chosen the wrong title for it, since the core of every UX analysis are the problems and goals each solution is trying to solve and achieve. By thinking about SEO, I've devalued the content of the story by presenting it as something it is not."</i><p>So the OP is not saying ditch SEO in favor of verbosity/cleverly-punny-vague titles, he's saying, don't write blog titles full of bullshit buzzwords.<p>Thanks for the insight.