TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

No Housing Bubble Trouble (2005)

70 点作者 jwallaceparker大约 12 年前

8 条评论

calhoun137大约 12 年前
This reminds me of this you tube video, called "Peter Schiff Was Right": <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2I0QN-FYkpw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2I0QN-FYkpw</a><p>It's basically a bunch of people screaming at Peter Schiff that he has no idea what he is talking about, when he was basically predicting everything that happened. Apparently Peter Schiff is pretty smart, I watched a bunch of these videos and listened to his radio show. He is now predicting a massive drop in the dollar due to inflation.
评论 #5552046 未加载
评论 #5550760 未加载
评论 #5550509 未加载
nkoren大约 12 年前
Compare to The Economist's take, at roughly the same time:<p>"The worldwide rise in house prices is the biggest bubble in history. Prepare for the economic pain when it pops"<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/node/4079027?story_id=4079027" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/node/4079027?story_id=4079027</a><p>That article was instrumental in convincing me to quit being an architect in 2007, since it was obvious that a real estate crash would bode ill for that profession.<p>When it comes to economic advice, I won't be taking any from the Cato Institute.
angersock大约 12 年前
Perhaps the money shot for the article:<p><pre><code> In short, we are asked to worry about something that has never happened for reasons still to be coherently explained. “Housing bubble” worrywarts have long been hopelessly confused. It would have been financially foolhardy to listen to them in 2002. It still is. </code></pre> :D
评论 #5550487 未加载
natmaster大约 12 年前
I am curious how an advocate of Keysian economics is a fellow at an institution that heralds itself as being "...dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, limited government, free markets and peace."
评论 #5549575 未加载
codeulike大约 12 年前
Would have been more prescient/anti-prescient if it discussed CDCs and the Rating Agencies in some way. At any point in time there are people shouting "bubble" and "no bubble" about anything. How close people got to figuring out the underlying mechanisms of the 2008 economy-blue-screen-of-death is more interesting.<p>(Yes, the economy blue-screened, we re-booted in safe mode but we're still not sure if we've fixed the drivers yet)
olympus大约 12 年前
I don't think the author was wrong (which seems to be the underlying implication of this article popping up seven years later). Sure, the housing bubble burst, but that was over a year after he wrote this article. A lot can change with the economy in a year, and obviously not everyone in 2005 thought that housing prices would fall. Indeed, if the majority of people in 2005 had thought that prices were going to fall then prices would have peaked in 2005 instead of 2006. If you look back after every downturn you will always find people who were bearish and you'll call them smart. You'll also find bulls like this guy and you'll call them dumb. But maybe it's more about being lucky or unlucky.
评论 #5549948 未加载
kislayverma大约 12 年前
I love these time-capsule style re-posts.
评论 #5550249 未加载
saosebastiao大约 12 年前
Well that is embarrassing.