Yahoo shuts down six products

What I find even more interesting that these shutdowns is that an entry from the Yahoo corp blog has made it to the front page of Hacker News. This may be a sign that people are starting to find Yahoo related news interesting again.

Error 999 Copyright © 2006 Yahoo!<p>---<p>Ironically, that's exactly how I think of Yahoo: stuck in 2006 and "are they dead yet?"

Verge article, since it seems dead: <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/19/4243852/yahoo-shuts-down-deals-kids-upcoming-and-more-in-attempt-to-focus" rel="nofollow">http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/19/4243852/yahoo-shuts-down-d...</a><p>Here's the list:<p>&#62;Deals, Yahoo Upcoming (and its API), Yahoo Kids, Yahoo SMS Alerts, and the J2ME feature phone versions of Yahoo Mail and Yahoo Messenger, all on April 30th.

Yahooligans was my introduction to the web. I'm sad to see it go. I hope it remains well-archived.

I don't understand why Yahoo! never properly promoted Upcoming.org. In fact, I don't understand why companies like Yahoo! go out of their way to acquire nice things only to abandon them when the next new, shiny thing comes along.

It's probably a good call to shut down these services. Yahoo has to change to survive.<p>What's not good is the amount of notice. 3 months should be the absolute minimum notice for shutting down a service. Otherwise you lose users' trust and that closes doors on future opportunities.

Not pertinent to the discussion, but why does some of the links use <a href="http://google.com/url?q=" rel="nofollow">http://google.com/url?q=</a> prefix for redirecting URLs? Any advantage of doing so instead of directly linking to the posts?

Whatever happened to Upcoming as a concept? It took quite a while for Lanyrd to fill the gap for tech conference goers, but that's basically just "us".<p>I just wonder why this turned out not to be a viable service. I would think there would have been a market for a global event calendar, and Upcoming at one time seemed well on it's way to being that until it got "Flickr-ed" by Yahoo.

If Mayer's playbook is to make Yahoo like Google, and to do what Page does from quarter-to-quarter, I don't think that's a bad plan actually.<p>Yahoo exists strictly on momentum at this point, so it's not a matter of re-org to fix - it's a matter or org. Might as well clone Google for the seed and go from there.

Thankfully I don't use these products so the shutdown doesn't personally affect me. The only issue that jumps out is the post went up 4/19 Friday afternoon and the shutdown date is 4/30, including the API. Anyone relying on these services has 7 business days to respond.

Did anyone notice that a number of the links in the blog post are being routed through Google? (via google.com/url?q=theurl) What's up with that?

Brace yourselves for some posts in the next days...<p>* "How I've been living with my mail server at home for six months"<p>* "Yahoo pushed for the use of technology INSERT_TECHNOLOGY_NAME and now they're trying to kill it by closing INSERT_SERVICE_NAME!"<p>* "Yahoo INSERT_SERVICE_NAME is closing, use INSERT_APP_NAME-ly to replace it (and import your current configuration)."<p>* "Show HN: This weekend I built an app to replace INSERT_SERVICE_NAME. It will never close, I promise."

I always imagined yahoo kids was profitable for them. maybe disney/angry-birds/whomever are just too dominant?

Upcoming and Yahoo Deals seem like good product ideas for improving personalization for users' local news. Does Yahoo have replacements for these services?

I'm surprised that Yahoo! directory (<a href="http://dir.yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">http://dir.yahoo.com</a>) is not in the gang of six.

Wow, did not realise that a) Yahoo kids existed and b) it was so embarrassingly terrible.

Hmm, think it might be time to get around to backing up my Flickr photos.

Might one say that they are putting more wood behind fewer arrows?

Probably a good call. I had never heard of any of those six.

Hey Google, this is what it really means to focus.