TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

We launched a free ad network to help publishers sell more Quality Ads

23 点作者 drivingsouth大约 12 年前

5 条评论

ScottWhigham大约 12 年前
There's so much about this that I just don't understand. I'm wondering, OP, is English a second/third language for your team? Or was this written in a weekend sprint/hurry-up mode/contest? There's just a <i>lot</i> on the home page alone that doesn't make sense.<p>"SELL QUALITY ADS &#38; SPONSORSHIPS FOR FREE" - why would <i>I</i> sell "for free"? Maybe you mean "commission free" or "without fees"? It's ambiguous. Oh sure, if I spend the time to think about it, I get it. But what percentage of your customers will spend that time? I'd say it's in the single digits...<p>"We are 100% FREE" - you aren't 100% free if I ever, in any circumstance during our relationship, pay you. It's either dishonest or misleading to say that you are 100% free and then, later in the ad copy, to say that there is a 6% fee.<p>"Our publishers own 100% of their quality, audience and value since we remove stuff that previously cannibalized their earnings." Your average visitor who spends 5 seconds on your page reads that and says to themselves, "What does that even mean?" Oh sure, if they think about it for 10-15 seconds, they'll understand your meaning but again: how many people will give you that time?<p>"DIRECT SALES ARE FREE. Sell and invoice on your own" - Ambiguous wording again. The average person thinks, "My direct sales are and have always been "free". I sold it directly, thus I made 100% of the profit."<p>"We introduced 100% optional pay-per-performance services: we only get paid when providing that extra value." - What does "100% optional" mean? Do I opt to pay 100%? Or is it a tipping system - it's optional that I pay you and at my discretion as to how much?<p>"Are you and Advertiser? Signup here!" - Just low rent and crappy to let your home page have a typo so blatant in your action text. Very poor show.<p>All in all, this is not a company I would do business with. Poor copy, no editing, ambiguous wording, and more unanswered questions than I can list all comes to mean that I'm closing the browser tab. Good luck to you - you have a lot to fix, I think, to make it "work". I hope it works out though - the world always needs new ideas and new executions on old ideas.
评论 #5607898 未加载
bogdans大约 12 年前
I don't want to be that guy but I used your network for two months and I was really disappointed. I quit your service in March and I hope you solved these issues by now. I was annoyed about the fact that the stats stopped to be shown to me after a month. I was just receiving money without knowing what clicks or impressions I had for the banners placed on my sites. Another thing that I disliked was that in the last month of partnership, there was only one advertiser in my banner cycle which meant that the variety of banners was low, leading to a decreasing number of clicks. I surely hope that by now you contacted more advertisers. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying these things to give you bad publicity, instead I'm hoping that you solved/are solving these problems so that me along with other publishers will use your service again. For the moment, I'm using Adsense and I'm receiving more money than from influAds.
评论 #5608279 未加载
shortformblog大约 12 年前
The thing that's interesting about this format is that it seems to be an update to one of the more interesting ad platforms out there: The Deck.<p>(It's the ad platform Gruber and LaughingSquid, among others, use.)<p>The Deck is neat because it focuses less on the type of content and more on the quality of the publishers in the network. But the problem is, it's invite only. While there are other ad platforms that do similar things, what's nice about this is that it appears to treat the publisher as nice as the advertiser.<p>We need more networks where individual traffic is less important than the quality of the publisher and audience. This is a really good start on that front.
评论 #5607704 未加载
drivingsouth大约 12 年前
Hi Guys Anibal, Founder and CEO of InfluAds here.<p>We think that advertising is a bit evil by charging marketplace fees to Quality Publishers. Since are obsessed about Quality Ads and hate clutter <i>a bit</i>, we decided to make a FREE ad network for those that care about Quality.<p>Publishers can sell any kind of digital ads &#38; sponsorships in our marketplace including Web, RSS and Email Ads, Video, Podcasts and Syndicated&#38;Promoted Content sponsorships.<p>Any thoughts?
评论 #5607422 未加载
dudus大约 12 年前
WE GET PAID ONLY WHEN ADDING VALUE: Our pay-per-performance model incentivizes us to help you since we only get paid when adding that extra help that you need.<p>Dude it's not free if you charge for it.
评论 #5607405 未加载