I'm not what anyone would call a Bush supporter, but the portion where they veer into personal attacks on his intelligence seems a bit out of place, if only for how low it stoops. I think that argument could have been framed much better.<p>To me, it seems like he's someone that easily gets flustered when speaking publicly, and has the unfortunate habit of digging in when he feels threatened (and he probably got overly sensitive to feeling threatened as time went on and he was mocked for his speaking.<p>It's also probably partly me. I would rather look for an explanation that doesn't entail him being an imbecile. Regardless of whether I liked or approved of him, I most definitely don't like the idea that we were lead by a moron for eight years, and what that implies about the country and populace that elected him - twice (depending on your view, I guess).